2001
DOI: 10.1097/00005768-200103000-00014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physiologic tolerance to uncompensable heat: intermittent exercise, field vs laboratory

Abstract: Exercise-rest cycles did not alter physiologic tolerance to UCHS. In addition, subjects from field studies demonstrate greater physiologic tolerance than subjects from laboratory studies.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
79
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
79
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A core temperature of 38°C was selected as an approximate minimum for intolerance (29), as it was well enough below (Ϫ1.5°C) our laboratory safety threshold to allow an ample time ϫ temperature interaction for AUC calculation, which is a more accurate index of total heat strain than peak body temperature (14).…”
Section: Heat Acclimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A core temperature of 38°C was selected as an approximate minimum for intolerance (29), as it was well enough below (Ϫ1.5°C) our laboratory safety threshold to allow an ample time ϫ temperature interaction for AUC calculation, which is a more accurate index of total heat strain than peak body temperature (14).…”
Section: Heat Acclimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Miles 1957;Pedoto et al 2003) or hypothermal or hyperthermal atmospheres (see e.g. Sawka et al 2001;Solonin and Katsyuba 2003). So, what about gravity and humans?…”
Section: A Large Radius Human Centrifugementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another, important, advantage of the temperature pill is the suitability in fieldbased situations, which is of great importance since exercise-induced elevations in Tc are generally higher in field than in laboratory settings 16 . Currently, the temperature pill is able to measure the Tgi every 10 sec with an accuracy of ±0.1°C, which makes this technique very suitable to measure the Tgi during an exercise event or an important match.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%