1987
DOI: 10.2307/3430439
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physiologic Assessment of Fetal Compromise: Biomarkers of Toxic Exposure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1991
1991
1991
1991

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After reviewing the situation, Longo described a "paradox" (6). Although several techniques for identifying individual exposures have been developed and tested, and although more and more xenobiotics have been recognized to have teratogenic and mutagenic potential, "essentially no specific biomarkers are currently available to indicate that exposure to a given xenobiotic is directly associated with a cellular, subcellular, or pharmacodynamic event" (6).…”
Section: Hogueand Brewsyermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…After reviewing the situation, Longo described a "paradox" (6). Although several techniques for identifying individual exposures have been developed and tested, and although more and more xenobiotics have been recognized to have teratogenic and mutagenic potential, "essentially no specific biomarkers are currently available to indicate that exposure to a given xenobiotic is directly associated with a cellular, subcellular, or pharmacodynamic event" (6).…”
Section: Hogueand Brewsyermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although several techniques for identifying individual exposures have been developed and tested, and although more and more xenobiotics have been recognized to have teratogenic and mutagenic potential, "essentially no specific biomarkers are currently available to indicate that exposure to a given xenobiotic is directly associated with a cellular, subcellular, or pharmacodynamic event" (6). The paradox continues, despite continuing advancements in laboratory science and the growing recognition of the need for biological markers to improve exposure measurement in the field ofenvironmental epidemiology (3,4,(7)(8)(9).…”
Section: Hogueand Brewsyermentioning
confidence: 99%