Clinical Radiotherapy Physics 2004
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-18549-6_17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physics of the Use of Small Sealed Sources in Brachytherapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 32 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(f ak,wat ) is the air kerma to dose in water conversion factor and is approximately 1.11 for 192 Ir and 137 Cs gamma energies. [ 3 ] The main difference between g(r), used in TG-43 formalism, and WPF(r) is that g(r) is the dose in water, normalized at 1 cm, along the perpendicular bisector of the actual source whereas WPF(r) is the ratio of dose in water to the dose in air for a point isotropic source. Both g(r) and WPF(r) vary only marginally with distance from the source up to about 5 cm for 192 Ir gamma energies, and may be ignored for manual dose verification.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(f ak,wat ) is the air kerma to dose in water conversion factor and is approximately 1.11 for 192 Ir and 137 Cs gamma energies. [ 3 ] The main difference between g(r), used in TG-43 formalism, and WPF(r) is that g(r) is the dose in water, normalized at 1 cm, along the perpendicular bisector of the actual source whereas WPF(r) is the ratio of dose in water to the dose in air for a point isotropic source. Both g(r) and WPF(r) vary only marginally with distance from the source up to about 5 cm for 192 Ir gamma energies, and may be ignored for manual dose verification.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%