1984
DOI: 10.1016/0167-9317(84)90046-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physics of nanometer structure devices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1988
1988
1997
1997

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Theoretical support for the above interpretation of the results on wide well samples comes from published self-consistent calculations [8, 101; for the widest case treated, a 500 8, wide QW [8], the results for a symmetric potential distribution show that the two lowest confined states are nearly degenerate in energy, and that each state has two equal probability density peaks, one close to each interface. Thus, in this case it is inappropriate to consider the electrons as being confined at one interface or the other, and the carriers in the two lowest sub-bands would be expected to have similar mobilities.…”
Section: J 'mentioning
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Theoretical support for the above interpretation of the results on wide well samples comes from published self-consistent calculations [8, 101; for the widest case treated, a 500 8, wide QW [8], the results for a symmetric potential distribution show that the two lowest confined states are nearly degenerate in energy, and that each state has two equal probability density peaks, one close to each interface. Thus, in this case it is inappropriate to consider the electrons as being confined at one interface or the other, and the carriers in the two lowest sub-bands would be expected to have similar mobilities.…”
Section: J 'mentioning
confidence: 82%
“…It is tempting, therefore, to assign the rapidlyvarying SDH oscillations to the electron density at the inverted interface, and the superimposed slower variation to a third sub-band, E', which is expected to be occupied in wide QWS [8]; this situation is illustrated in figure 5 ( d ) . Such a correspondence between nb and high field SDH oscillations is rather surprising, since although the conduction in this magnetic field region is essentially dominated by the low mobility channel [ 141, Reed 2ooF 100 I I…”
Section: P*x=(dl+d)i[(d1+d32+(a1+a2)21mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation