2023
DOI: 10.1109/tnsre.2022.3226860
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physics-Informed Deep Learning for Musculoskeletal Modeling: Predicting Muscle Forces and Joint Kinematics From Surface EMG

Abstract: Musculoskeletal models have been widely used for detailed biomechanical analysis to characterise various functional impairments given their ability to estimate movement variables (i.e., muscle forces and joint moments) which cannot be readily measured in vivo. Physics-based computational neuromusculoskeletal models can interpret the dynamic interaction between neural drive to muscles, muscle dynamics, body and joint kinematics and kinetics. Still, such set of solutions suffers from slowness, especially for the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A dataset that better represents the complete functional range could improve network performance, while a physics-informed neural network (e.g. [29,30]) could also improve network performance at extremes where data recording is difficult. A physics-informed neural network calculates the loss not only from training data, but also based on some physics relationships that the network should follow.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A dataset that better represents the complete functional range could improve network performance, while a physics-informed neural network (e.g. [29,30]) could also improve network performance at extremes where data recording is difficult. A physics-informed neural network calculates the loss not only from training data, but also based on some physics relationships that the network should follow.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, researchers have turned to data-driven (machine learning) approaches for estimating human biomechanics, since they are more automated, require less parameterization and manual effort, and offer real-time solutions as well. Most works develop surrogate models for force estimation or prediction that focus on estimating medial and lateral knee contact (KC) forces [5], [7]- [9] or muscle forces in lower extremities [5], [9], [11] using a plethora of DL techniques, such as ANNs [7], [8], RNNs, fully-connected neural networks [9], and CNNs [5], [9], or ML algorithms, such as principal component regression (i.e. a regression analysis based on PCA) [9].…”
Section: A Force Estimation By Machine Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In respect to application field, ML-based solutions focus mainly in estimating tibiofemoral load data during gait [5], [7], [9], [11], sit-to-stand [9] or more rarely sport movements [8]. Models were trained using raw data (marker motion data, ground reaction forces (GRFs), muscle electromyography (EMG), IMU signals) as well as derivative data from musculoskeletal analyses (e.g.…”
Section: A Force Estimation By Machine Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This notion, that the difference in the explana-tions given by the model need to mirror the differences that humans perceive, motivated us to use similarity information to improve explainability as in knowledge-based approaches. Papers that have been improved by using this knowledge include [35] and [36] which improve musculoskeletal modeling based on information from physics.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%