2023
DOI: 10.1038/s41524-023-00987-9
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physics guided deep learning for generative design of crystal materials with symmetry constraints

Abstract: Discovering new materials is a challenging task in materials science crucial to the progress of human society. Conventional approaches based on experiments and simulations are labor-intensive or costly with success heavily depending on experts’ heuristic knowledge. Here, we propose a deep learning based Physics Guided Crystal Generative Model (PGCGM) for efficient crystal material design with high structural diversity and symmetry. Our model increases the generation validity by more than 700% compared to FTCP,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(62 reference statements)
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…26,29 Instead, VAE models always generate crystal structures with very low symmetry. 28 On the other hand, we only use materials falling in the three space groups Fm 3̄ m , F 4̄3 m , and Pm 3̄ m because these three space groups are with the greatest number of materials in the OQMD 30 using selection criteria in CubicGAN.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…26,29 Instead, VAE models always generate crystal structures with very low symmetry. 28 On the other hand, we only use materials falling in the three space groups Fm 3̄ m , F 4̄3 m , and Pm 3̄ m because these three space groups are with the greatest number of materials in the OQMD 30 using selection criteria in CubicGAN.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The generator takes random noise as input to generate fake samples and the discriminator tells the fake samples from the real ones. CubicGAN 24 and PGCGM 28 are two typical crystal generative models using GANs. Both are provided with the space group in the training and physical losses are added in PGCGM to improve the performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A more efficient approach would combine these extremes to avoid the need to evaluate candidates that are ultimately discarded by the subsequent process. This might range from including physics-based symmetry contraints, 161 directly incorporating a learned formation energy constraint into the generative process, 162 or by restricting the generating samples to obey compositional "grammatical" rules. 163 The combination of empirical synthetic accessibility metrics, fragment-and synthesis-based constraints, and forward and reverse synthesis prediction to constrain generative models for drug design 160 can serve as a model for materials chemists.…”
Section: Vc Sample What Can Be Made and How To Make It � Defer Optimi...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In that respect, this model is the most similar to ours. The second one is the Physics Guided Crystal Generative Model (PGCGM), 49 which uses a Generative Adversarial Network to sample crystal structures within a given set of 20 space groups. For a fair comparison, all models should be trained on the same data set.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%