2015
DOI: 10.1103/physrevstper.11.020107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physics education research: A research subfield of physics with gender parity

Abstract: Women currently outnumber men in obtaining undergraduate degrees but are underrepresented within STEM fields. However, women's representation varies by STEM field, and even further by STEM subfield. One field that has held a persistent low representation of women is physics. This paper seeks to uncover the truth behind an anecdotal claim that the subfield of physics education research (PER) has a higher representation of women than physics as a whole. Graduate students in PER completed an online survey to asse… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
(7 reference statements)
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is a well-documented fact that the disciplines of science, technology, engineering and math (STEM) are pre-dominated by male students (Islam Dip, 2017;Steegh, Höffler, Keller, & Parchmann, 2019). In the past few decades, studying issues of gender in physics has been a topic of concern in the physics education community (Barthelemy, Van Dusen, & Henderson, 2015;Brewe & Sawtelle, 2016;Dam-o, Gondek, Karbowiak, & Wibig, 2018;Gee, 2015;Jones & Kirk, 1990;Kelly, 2016;Madsen, McKagan, & Sayre, 2013;Potvin & Hazari, 2016;Rodriguez, Potvin, & Kramer, 2016;Traxler, Cid, Blue, & Barthelemy, 2016;Wilson, Low, Verdon, & Verdon, 2016). Despite some progress has been made in narrowing the gender gap in science in recent years, the number of girls and women in the fields of physics, engineering and technology is still insufficient and marginal (Dam-o et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is a well-documented fact that the disciplines of science, technology, engineering and math (STEM) are pre-dominated by male students (Islam Dip, 2017;Steegh, Höffler, Keller, & Parchmann, 2019). In the past few decades, studying issues of gender in physics has been a topic of concern in the physics education community (Barthelemy, Van Dusen, & Henderson, 2015;Brewe & Sawtelle, 2016;Dam-o, Gondek, Karbowiak, & Wibig, 2018;Gee, 2015;Jones & Kirk, 1990;Kelly, 2016;Madsen, McKagan, & Sayre, 2013;Potvin & Hazari, 2016;Rodriguez, Potvin, & Kramer, 2016;Traxler, Cid, Blue, & Barthelemy, 2016;Wilson, Low, Verdon, & Verdon, 2016). Despite some progress has been made in narrowing the gender gap in science in recent years, the number of girls and women in the fields of physics, engineering and technology is still insufficient and marginal (Dam-o et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These numbers can vary by subfield [1,4,5], but the overall physics average remains small. This low representation has been the focus of many prior studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When specifically considering the field of PER, only one article has been published. The PER article by Barthelemy, Van Dusen, and Henderson [6] was the first of a series of articles on graduate PER student experiences. Our article presented here is a companion piece to the Barthelemy, Van Dusen, and Henderson [6] article that examined the qualitative portions of our mixed methods study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PER article by Barthelemy, Van Dusen, and Henderson [6] was the first of a series of articles on graduate PER student experiences. Our article presented here is a companion piece to the Barthelemy, Van Dusen, and Henderson [6] article that examined the qualitative portions of our mixed methods study. The qualitative portion of the research was an exploratory study using in-depth interviews with 13 graduate students and post-doctoral scholars in PER.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation