2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.229327
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physics-based prognostics of implantable-grade lithium-ion battery for remaining useful life prediction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The indicators (interval points and integral of voltage vs. time as features; a time constant from the charging current curve; minimum and average temperature; IC-based and DV-based; cycle number etc.) from the charging curves can be explored because the charging curves are stable and the charging profile is usually fixed before charging is carried out [33][34][35][36][37][38]. The selected indicators from the charging curves shall be mapped to estimate the SoC, SoH and RUL using deep learning networks combined with transfer learning.…”
Section: Research Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The indicators (interval points and integral of voltage vs. time as features; a time constant from the charging current curve; minimum and average temperature; IC-based and DV-based; cycle number etc.) from the charging curves can be explored because the charging curves are stable and the charging profile is usually fixed before charging is carried out [33][34][35][36][37][38]. The selected indicators from the charging curves shall be mapped to estimate the SoC, SoH and RUL using deep learning networks combined with transfer learning.…”
Section: Research Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PoF methods have been tested on electronic components in monitoring the health of electronic components by Pecht et al [ 14 ]. The RUL of lithium-ion batteries has been predicted by physics-based models in [ 15 ]. There are also several publications that address prognostics modeling based on evolutionary methods derived from bio-inspired [ 16 , 17 ] and neuro-inspired algorithms [ 18 , 19 ].…”
Section: Review Of Key Concepts and Trendsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The more common equivalent circuit model are mainly the RC model, PNGV model, Thevenin model, Rint model, and so on. RUL prediction method based on the equivalent circuit model relative to the electrochemical model is more simple 23 . However, the equivalent circuit model cannot fully reflect the electrochemical reaction of lithium‐ion battery internal features, hence the dynamic characteristics of lithium‐ion batteries cannot be fully reflected 24 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RUL prediction method based on the equivalent circuit model relative to the electrochemical model is more simple. 23 However, the equivalent circuit model cannot fully reflect the electrochemical reaction of lithium-ion battery internal features, hence the dynamic characteristics of lithium-ion batteries cannot be fully reflected. 24 The RUL prediction method based on the empirical model does not need analysis of the internal electrochemistry reaction of the battery, 25 which is the most commonly used RUL prediction method in the laboratory stage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%