2011
DOI: 10.1080/10643380903392817
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physicochemical Technologies for Remediation of Chromium-Containing Waters and Wastewaters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
53
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 151 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 202 publications
1
53
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, technical applicability, cost-effectiveness and plant simplicity are the key factors in selecting the most suitable treatment method to remove heavy metals (such as copper, arsenic, lead and zinc) and cyanide from contaminated ecosystem (Acheampong et al 2010). However, the latest technologies like photocatalytic reduction, surfactant-based membranes, liquid membranes and surface complexation are more efficient for heavy metals removal from contaminated ecosystems (Malaviya and Singh 2011;Xu et al 2012). …”
Section: Remediation Of Heavy Metalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, technical applicability, cost-effectiveness and plant simplicity are the key factors in selecting the most suitable treatment method to remove heavy metals (such as copper, arsenic, lead and zinc) and cyanide from contaminated ecosystem (Acheampong et al 2010). However, the latest technologies like photocatalytic reduction, surfactant-based membranes, liquid membranes and surface complexation are more efficient for heavy metals removal from contaminated ecosystems (Malaviya and Singh 2011;Xu et al 2012). …”
Section: Remediation Of Heavy Metalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Varying dose of CSO-INPs (0.1, 0.3, 0.5, and 1 mg/ml) was treated for different time interval (10,20,30,40, 50, 60 min) at different pH (2,3,5,8,10) and temperature (28, 38°C), to illustrate the effect of CSO-INPs doses on the adsorption of Cr ions from the aqueous solution. ANN simulation has been done for CSO-INPs doses (0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8, 0.9, 1 mg/ml) at different pH (2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10) and different initial Cr concentration Fig.…”
Section: Effect Of Nanoparticles Dose On Cr Removal Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The batch experiments were performed to evaluate the Cr removal efficiency of CSO-INPs at different pH (2,3,5,8,10), for different doses of CSO-INPs (0.1, 0.3, 0.5, 0.9, 1.0 mg/ml) at different temperatures (28, 38°C) and for different initial pollutant (Cr) concentrations (10, 20 ppm). Once the ANN model has been prepared and validated as discussed in ''ANN modelling and validation'' section, the ANN simulation has been carried out to obtain the Cr removal efficiency for varying inputs pH (2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10), CSO-INPs doses (0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8, 0.9, 1 mg/ml), initial pollutant concentrations (10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35 ppm), temperatures (20, 25, 28, 30, 35, 38, 40, 45°C).…”
Section: Batch Experiments and Ann Model To Evaluate Cr Removal Efficmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Chromium (VI) is the toxic form of the element which causes severe diseases in human beings like diarrhea, ulcers, eye and skin irritation, kidney dysfunction and probably lung carcinoma (Malaviya and Singh, 2011). Tannery wastewaters contain large quantities of Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD), color, sodium sulphide, nitrate, chloride, chromium and suspended solids (Sharma and Malaviya, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%