1993
DOI: 10.1006/jcis.1993.1118
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physicochemical Surface Characteristics of Urogenital and Poultry Lactobacilli

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
34
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
7
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The values of the N/C ratio found for the bacterial cultures from the various media are within the range reported in the literature. The N/C ratio of the surfaces of lactic acid bacteria is typically between 0.09 and 0.15 (6,16), although values as low as 0.04 have been reported previously (13).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The values of the N/C ratio found for the bacterial cultures from the various media are within the range reported in the literature. The N/C ratio of the surfaces of lactic acid bacteria is typically between 0.09 and 0.15 (6,16), although values as low as 0.04 have been reported previously (13).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(23), responsible for the strong electron donor character, but this needs to be investigated further. In gram-negative bacteria, a hydrophilic cell surface is associated with the presence of polysaccharides, whereas hydrophobic surfaces contain more (glyco-)proteinaceous material (5). The lack of these surface materials in Listeria suggested that modification of the cell surface is largely due to teichoic acids, which are responsible for antigenic determination (30) and also serve as phage receptors (31), or due to the peptidoglycan itself.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the impact of adaptation in limiting the extent by which alkali challenge may reduce CSH values may indicate a broader protective effect of adaptation in limiting cell surface disruption and/or maintaining a wider range of such cell surface activities. However, it is important to note that the significant surface components which contribute to CSH in Listeria are different from the types of surface of components which dictate CSH values in Gram-negative bacteria CSH values that are principally dictated by polysaccharides or (glyco-) proteinaceous material [32]. In Listeria, such materials are very limited or completely absent, and stress related changes in CSH in this organism involve changes in teichoic acids and/or peptidoglycans [33].…”
Section: Effect Of Ph On Cell Surface Hydropho-bicitymentioning
confidence: 99%