2020
DOI: 10.1186/s12989-020-00392-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physicochemical characterization and genotoxicity of the broad class of carbon nanotubes and nanofibers used or produced in U.S. facilities

Abstract: Background Carbon nanotubes and nanofibers (CNT/F) have known toxicity but simultaneous comparative studies of the broad material class, especially those with a larger diameter, with computational analyses linking toxicity to their fundamental material characteristics was lacking. It was unclear if all CNT/F confer similar toxicity, in particular, genotoxicity. Nine CNT/F (MW #1–7 and CNF #1–2), commonly found in exposure assessment studies of U.S. facilities, were evaluated with reported diameters ranging fro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
28
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 125 publications
2
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, high levels of DNA strand breaks were observed in mouse lung tissue for all doses [22]. Accordingly, length of MWCNT has been suggested as predictor of genotoxicity [62]. The unaltered levels of DNA strand breaks in A549 cells exposed to long MWCNT might indicate the limitation of testing some NM, such as stiff and long MWCNT, in 2D cell cultures; the A549 might be too static to obtain the effects observed in vivo, where damage could be generated by the stiff fibers in a moving lung.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similarly, high levels of DNA strand breaks were observed in mouse lung tissue for all doses [22]. Accordingly, length of MWCNT has been suggested as predictor of genotoxicity [62]. The unaltered levels of DNA strand breaks in A549 cells exposed to long MWCNT might indicate the limitation of testing some NM, such as stiff and long MWCNT, in 2D cell cultures; the A549 might be too static to obtain the effects observed in vivo, where damage could be generated by the stiff fibers in a moving lung.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…DNA damage caused by MWCNT has been linked to ROS production and oxidative stress [61]. We have previously shown large ROS production by DCFH oxidation assay with short MWCNT, including NRCWE-026 (same product but a different batch of NM-400; contains more Al 2 O 3 ) [14], NM-403, as well as NRCWE-040, − 041, and − 042 [14,62]]. This might explain the higher levels of DNA strand breaks in cells exposed to short MWCNT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ferric Reducing Ability of Serum (FRAS) Assay: FRAS assay was performed to study acellular oxidant generation ability of individual and co-exposures by following the already published methodology [ 31 , 32 ] with a slight modification. In order to accurately mimic the inhalation exposure and eliminate the artifacts that might arise due to interaction with room air, we bubbled aerosols (air, CB, O 3 and CB + O 3 ) for 5 min through the human serum and proceeded to quantify the changes by exactly following the previously published standardized methodology.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CNTs have received particular attention due to their apparent similarities with other fiber-like materials, although inadequate or limited evidence of carcinogenicity exists for most CNTs [ 10 ]. Notwithstanding, in a recent study of seven different CNTs and two carbon nanofibers (CNFs), all the tested materials except one highly aggregated MWCNT sample induced genotoxicity in human bronchial epithelial cells (BEAS-2B) [ 11 ]. There was a tendency for CNTs/CNFs with increasing length and diameter to display slightly greater toxicity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%