2020
DOI: 10.1080/19476337.2020.1725644
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physicochemical characteristics and fatty acid profile of beef in Northeastern Mexico: grazing vs feedlot systems

Abstract: Physicochemical characteristics and lipid profile of beef from cattle feeding on grazing and feedlot were compared. Forty beef samples were collected from each feeding system. The samples were taken from the Longissimus dorsi muscle. There were no differences between the feeding systems (P > 0.05) with regard to pH, luminosity index (L*), red (a*), yellow (b*), drip loss, and cooking yield. Regarding the nutritional content, there were significant differences in moisture and fat contents (P < 0.05), but not in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the high-energy diet changed the average marbling score from USDA low choice to high choice. The energy content of the diet for the GRAIN system resulted in the rapid growth of the cattle and thereby a greater deposition of intramuscular fat ( Wood et al, 2008 , Bautista-Martínez et al, 2020 ). Similar results were also reported by Alfaia et al (2009) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the high-energy diet changed the average marbling score from USDA low choice to high choice. The energy content of the diet for the GRAIN system resulted in the rapid growth of the cattle and thereby a greater deposition of intramuscular fat ( Wood et al, 2008 , Bautista-Martínez et al, 2020 ). Similar results were also reported by Alfaia et al (2009) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the exception of three findings, the moisture ranges from 71% to 76%, and three quarters of the reported data are between 72% and 74%. The three excluded findings appear to be outliers, reporting very low moisture values [ 96 , 98 ]. Two of these data points are from a study comparing the use of anabolic steroid implants where low moisture contents (about 60%) and concomitant high protein contents (about 36%) were reported [ 96 ].…”
Section: Nutrient Compositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two of these data points are from a study comparing the use of anabolic steroid implants where low moisture contents (about 60%) and concomitant high protein contents (about 36%) were reported [ 96 ]. The third is from a study comparing meat from cattle raised on pasture with supplementation to feedlots, and the moisture contents of the latter were reported as 67.3%, likely, at least in part, a consequence of the high IMF content [ 98 ]. Indeed, in all of the studies reporting differences in moisture content, these data correspond with opposing differences in IMF content.…”
Section: Nutrient Compositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations