2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2020.11.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physicochemical, biological, and antibacterial evaluation of tricalcium silicate-based reparative cements with different radiopacifiers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
36
1
4

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
5
36
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…It was demonstrated that novel experimental cement ALBO-DENT performed satisfactory behavior in cell culture, comparable to that of PC and MTA. Presented results showed significantly lower percentage of viable cells in MTA/PC treatments than those found in some studies (80-150%) [7,33,34], but they are in agreement with other studies [35,36]. For PC/ MTA 1:2 and 1:4 eluents, the CV and MTT tests showed similar outcomes and are in rough agreement with data documented in the literature [7,37].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…It was demonstrated that novel experimental cement ALBO-DENT performed satisfactory behavior in cell culture, comparable to that of PC and MTA. Presented results showed significantly lower percentage of viable cells in MTA/PC treatments than those found in some studies (80-150%) [7,33,34], but they are in agreement with other studies [35,36]. For PC/ MTA 1:2 and 1:4 eluents, the CV and MTT tests showed similar outcomes and are in rough agreement with data documented in the literature [7,37].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Presented results showed significantly lower percentage of viable cells in MTA/PC treatments than those found in some studies (80-150%) [7,33,34], but they are in agreement with other studies [35,36]. For PC/ MTA 1:2 and 1:4 eluents, the CV and MTT tests showed similar outcomes and are in rough agreement with data documented in the literature [7,37]. The differences of cell viability results in different studies could arise from variations in specimens' size (5×3 mm [37], 5×2 mm [12] and 5×1 mm [29]).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 60%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A number of studies have shown that biomaterials that have high solubility require more time for their complete setting [27,[50][51][52]. Thus, this high solubility can influence the quality of root canal treatment and increase microbial infiltration over time [33]. Calcium silicate-based endodontic sealers are currently commercially presented in ready-to-use or powder/liquid formulas.…”
Section: Root Canal Filling Materials (Sealers)mentioning
confidence: 99%