2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.03.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physicochemical and in-vitro biological analysis of bio-functionalized titanium samples in a protein-rich medium

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
9
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…There were no differences in the adherence of S. aureus to a titanium surface pre-conditioned with fibrinogen when compared to the non-conditioned surface ( Figure S2). These results are in line with the ones obtained by Rao et al [52] that showed how the pre-conditioning of titanium with fibrinogen and fibrinogen clotted with thrombin promoted osseointegration, but the biofilm formation by Enterococcus faecalis in these bio-functionalized materials did not show significant differences with the titanium control.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…There were no differences in the adherence of S. aureus to a titanium surface pre-conditioned with fibrinogen when compared to the non-conditioned surface ( Figure S2). These results are in line with the ones obtained by Rao et al [52] that showed how the pre-conditioning of titanium with fibrinogen and fibrinogen clotted with thrombin promoted osseointegration, but the biofilm formation by Enterococcus faecalis in these bio-functionalized materials did not show significant differences with the titanium control.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Moreover, all the three trials (trial 16–18) in MWCNTs mixed dielectric at a discharge current of 4A exhibits good roughness values within the variation of 4% (approx.). The roughness value reported is acceptable and within the range, required for the bio-implants for proper cell proliferation, bone-implant fixation [ 40 , 41 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies have proposed approaches to enhance implant osseointegration by developing an osteogenic surface or to prevent infection by incorporating antibiotic molecules or peptides in the surface coating (Smeets et al 2016; Escobar et al 2021). One promising alternative could be the development of implants with multifunctional surfaces capable of interacting with the host tissue to increase osseointegration while reducing bacterial activity (Raphel et al 2016; Rao et al 2019). Implant surfaces can be modified with bioactive therapeutics such as BMP-2 to enhance osteogenic potential; however, high costs and complications at high dosages hinder translation into clinical applications.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%