Physico-mechanical properties of a nanofilled glass ionomer cement

Alzraikat, Hanan; Maghaireh, Ghada; Zawaideh, Feda

doi:10.5455/jrmds.20164320

Cited by 7 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The wear resistance, polishability, and aesthetics are improved by the inclusion of nanotechnology. 9 When compared to the other glass ionomer-based types of cement utilized in this study, the Ketac N 100 GIC had the highest compressive strength. The inclusion of nanofiller particles in resin-modified GICs may be the reason for the maximum compressive strength of this GIC.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 80%

Comparative Evaluation of Compressive Strength of Self-cure, Dual-cure, and Light-cure Glass Ionomer Cements in a Simulated Oral Environment: An In Vitro Study

Peedikayil,

Chandru,

Kottayi

et al. 2023

International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A bstract Background In primary dentition, glass ionomer cements (GICs) have unique benefits as a restorative material. Various types of GICs are available in the market. In pediatric dentistry, the choice of GI materials is generally focused on handling convenience with adequate consideration for mechanical qualities, including compressive strength to withstand occlusal stresses in the oral environment. Aim of the study To evaluate the compressive strength of self-cure, dual-cure, and light-cure GI-based cements using a universal testing machine. Materials and methods The study population comprised 30 cylindrical restorative blocks for compressive strength assessment. The restorative materials used for the studies were self-cure GIC (ChemFil Rock and GC Fuji IX GP Fast GIC), dual-cure GIC (Equia Forte and Ionolux GIC), and light-cure GIC (GC Fuji II LC and Ketac N 100 GIC). The cylindrical blocks were prepared using prefabricated Teflon mold measuring 4 mm diameter and 6 mm height from respective restorative materials and divided into three major groups and were subdivided into six groups comprising two materials in each group. Using an Instron universal testing machine, compressive strength was assessed. Data obtained were tabulated, and statistical analysis was done using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS v22.0) software. Results On individual comparison of GI-based types of cement, Ketac N100 GIC showed the highest compressive strength, and Fuji IX GP Fast GIC showed the least compressive strength. Conclusion Light-cure GIC exhibited the highest compressive strength in comparison to dual-cure and self-cure GICs with regard to the nature of curing. How to cite this article Chandru TP, Chandran S, Peedikayil FC, et al. Comparative Evaluation of Compressive Strength of Self-cure, Dual-cure, and Light-cure Glass Ionomer Cements in a Simulated Oral Environment: An In Vitro Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2023;16(5):707–710.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 80%

Comparative Evaluation of Compressive Strength of Self-cure, Dual-cure, and Light-cure Glass Ionomer Cements in a Simulated Oral Environment: An In Vitro Study

Peedikayil,

Chandru,

Kottayi

et al. 2023

International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Voids are defined as trapped air that creates empty space. 29 In contrast to the other subgroups, the two types of GIC materials in the control group met the ADA standard with a mean value of 143.08 MPa for conventional GIC and 161.10 MPa for glass hybrid GIC. 30 The mean compressive strength of EQUIA Forte Fil without a protective coating was found to be the highest among the entire sample groups, while Fuji IX GP Extra without a protective coating ranked the second.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 88%

Effect of Nanofilled Resin-Based Coating on the Compressive Strength of Glass Ionomer Cement – in vitro

Setiawan

Gunawan

Wulansari

et al. 2022

Majalah Kedokteran Gigi Indonesia

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Glass ionomer cement as one of the restoration materials requires high compressive strength so it can last during functional activity. The latest glass ionomer cement comes with glass hybrid technology and a nanofilled resin-based protective coating which is said to increase the compressive strength of glass ionomer cement. The aim of this study was to analyze the effect of nanofilled resin-based coating and the types of glass ionomer cement materials on their compressive strength. Two types of commercial glass ionomer cement material were used; conventional (Fuji IX GP Extra), and hybrid (EQUIA Forte Fill) glass ionomer cement. Forty cylindrical (4 x 6 mm) samples were prepared in each group. The main group was divided into 4 subgroups (n=10) based on the protective coating used (EQUIA Forte Coat, Varnish, Control, Water + EQUIA Forte Coat). Eight subgroups were immersed in 37 °C distilled water for 7 days, then a compressive strength test was performed using a universal testing machine. The data analysis showed no significant difference in the compressive strength between the two types of glass ionomer cement materials (p>0.05). The use of a protective coating was associated with a significant decrease in the compressive strength (p<0.05). The use of glass ionomer cement without the application of a protective coating was considered to be quite good because the compressive strength value of the restoration still met the standards of the American Dental Association.

show abstract

“…7 Among the mechanical properties, compressive strength and flexural strength are the widely used properties in evaluating the clinical performance of the restorative materials. 8 Compressive strength is often used as a measure to evaluate the ability of the material to withstand the masticatory force. 9 Flexural strength is used to evaluate the strength of the material and the amount of distortion expected under bending stress.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Study of Total Time Taken for OPD Billing Process in a Multi-Specialty Hospital

2020

IJPHRD

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background and Objectives: Dental caries is one of the most common problem encountered in pediatric patients. Despite modern advances in prevention of dental caries, many teeth are still lost prematurely leading to loss of function, esthetics, arch length and arch symmetry. Various restorative materials are available for the treatment of dental caries. Physical and mechanical tests were applied to analyze the structural designs of restorative materials. Various researches have been carried out in search of an ideal restorative material.Hence, the present in-vitro study was done to evaluate and compare the mechanical properties(compressive strength,flexural strength and knoop microhardness) of Ceramic Reinforced Glass Ionomer Cement (Amalgomer CR) and Type IX GIC. Results:The study showed a statistically significant difference in the compressive strength, flexural strength and knoop microhardness of ceramic reinforced glass ionomer cement (Amalgomer CR) and is superior when compared to Type IX GIC. Conclusion:The study concluded that the mechanical properties (compressive strength, flexural strength and knoop microhardness) of ceramic reinforced glass ionomer cement (Amalgomer CR) is superior to Type IX GIC.

show abstract

Physico-mechanical properties of a nanofilled glass ionomer cement

Cited by 7 publications

References 0 publications

Comparative Evaluation of Compressive Strength of Self-cure, Dual-cure, and Light-cure Glass Ionomer Cements in a Simulated Oral Environment: An In Vitro Study

Comparative Evaluation of Compressive Strength of Self-cure, Dual-cure, and Light-cure Glass Ionomer Cements in a Simulated Oral Environment: An In Vitro Study

Effect of Nanofilled Resin-Based Coating on the Compressive Strength of Glass Ionomer Cement – in vitro

Study of Total Time Taken for OPD Billing Process in a Multi-Specialty Hospital

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About