2018
DOI: 10.5897/jhf2016.0491
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physico-chemical properties of soil under the canopies of Faidherbia albida (Delile) A. Chev and Acacia tortilis (Forssk.) Hayen in park land agroforestry system in Central Rift Valley, Ethiopia

Abstract: This study was conducted to evaluate the effect of Faidherbia albida and Acacia tortilis on soil physicochemical properties at Langano and Tuka in farm fields of Bora District where both trees are traditionally retained on the farm. At each site, four F. albida and four A. tortilis trees were purposively selected and soil sample collected from four directions at three distances (1.35, 3.35 and 26.35 m) from tree trunk and composite soil samples was taken for both physico-chemical analyses. Collected data was a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This could be because most sampling points in urban lawn are in closer proximity to trees (the distance ranged from 3.3 to 15.4 m, average 7.6 m), while on average, the distance of soil points to the closest tree in Heaton Sports Ground is 31.6 m (nearest: 8.5 m, farthest: 75.3 m). The presence and abundance of soil microbes (Nacke et al, 2016), and soil chemical properties such as the concentration of metals (Desta et al, 2018), can be importantly influenced by the distance between soil sampling site and the tree trunk, which are all driving factors for soil carbon formation. As explained by Livesley et al ( 2016), tree roots not only modify soil compaction and improve nutrient cycling but also enhance organic input to the ground and strengthen soil carbon content.…”
Section: Topsoil Carbon Content and Mineral Compositionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could be because most sampling points in urban lawn are in closer proximity to trees (the distance ranged from 3.3 to 15.4 m, average 7.6 m), while on average, the distance of soil points to the closest tree in Heaton Sports Ground is 31.6 m (nearest: 8.5 m, farthest: 75.3 m). The presence and abundance of soil microbes (Nacke et al, 2016), and soil chemical properties such as the concentration of metals (Desta et al, 2018), can be importantly influenced by the distance between soil sampling site and the tree trunk, which are all driving factors for soil carbon formation. As explained by Livesley et al ( 2016), tree roots not only modify soil compaction and improve nutrient cycling but also enhance organic input to the ground and strengthen soil carbon content.…”
Section: Topsoil Carbon Content and Mineral Compositionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another reason could be due to the lignified cells found in tree litter, branches, bark, roots, etc., which could lead to C stabilization and slower mineralization in the soil [82]. The slower oxidation rate of organic matter under tree shade [83], the addition of root exudates [84], and accumulation of more organic matter as a result of fine root degradation in the underground [85] may also initiate higher SOC stock. Similar results were reported by [75], who found higher SOC stock in homegarden AF than foodcrop monoculture land; [86] homegarden AF systems showed 114% greater SOC stock than rice paddies, and [79] observed increased soil organic C by 11-52% in AF systems compared to monocropped fields.…”
Section: Soil Organic Carbon Stocks Of Af Systems Versus Their Adjace...mentioning
confidence: 99%