2017
DOI: 10.1186/s12911-017-0510-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physicians’ pharmacogenomics information needs and seeking behavior: a study with case vignettes

Abstract: BackgroundGenetic testing, especially in pharmacogenomics, can have a major impact on patient care. However, most physicians do not feel that they have sufficient knowledge to apply pharmacogenomics to patient care. Online information resources can help address this gap. We investigated physicians’ pharmacogenomics information needs and information-seeking behavior, in order to guide the design of pharmacogenomics information resources that effectively meet clinical information needs.MethodsWe performed a form… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
14
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, even if information about PGx testing is found, it may not be comprehensive, accurate or understandable to patients. Providers have also reported struggling to find information online about PGx testing to inform appropriate use [14,15]. Patients with low health literacy may have additional challenges with comprehending information about PGx testing or be less likely to seek health information [16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, even if information about PGx testing is found, it may not be comprehensive, accurate or understandable to patients. Providers have also reported struggling to find information online about PGx testing to inform appropriate use [14,15]. Patients with low health literacy may have additional challenges with comprehending information about PGx testing or be less likely to seek health information [16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other mentioned themes ( n = 4) were ‘increased awareness of resources by training’ (Almazrou et al, 2019; Bellman et al, 2005; Bernard et al, 2012; Heponiemi et al, 2019). Other facilitators ( n = 3) were ‘navigation support’ (Bernard et al, 2012; Heale et al, 2017; Rahmner et al, 2012), ‘more relevant and reliable information for clinical practice’ (Bellman et al, 2005; Bernard et al, 2012; Sarbaz et al, 2018), ‘reduced Financial cost’ (Bernard et al, 2012; Sarbaz et al, 2018; Shabi et al, 2011) and ‘smart features linked to the HER’ (Cook et al, 2018; King et al, 2019; Rahmner et al, 2012). Reoccurring themes (factors) include ‘summarised and analysed evidence‐based materials’ (Bernard et al, 2012; Shabi et al, 2011), ‘ready access to electronic resources’ (Cook et al, 2013; Heale et al, 2017), ‘utilisation of Internet and information searching skills’ (Norbert & Lwoga, 2013; Shabi et al, 2011), ‘knowing preferred sites or textbooks’ (Bennett et al, 2006; Norbert & Lwoga, 2013), ‘being in the teaching environment’ (Bellman et al, 2005; Kahouei, Alaei, Panahi, & Zadeh, 2015).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Having the ability to access clinical information for decision‐making about patient care is essential for physicians (Sarbaz, Kimiafar, & Yazdipour, 2017). In such case, accurate, available (Norbert & Lwoga, 2013), reliable (Callen, Buyankhishig, & McIntosh, 2008; Kazempour & Ashrafi‐rizi, 2018), best evidence (Bernard, Arnould, Saint‐Lary, Duhot, & Hebbrecht, 2012) and up‐to‐date (Gonzalez‐Gonzalez et al, 2007; Kazempour & Ashrafi‐rizi, 2018) clinical information will decrease referral rate, improves diagnostic accuracy, increases treatment efficiency (Cook, Sorensen, Wilkinson, & Berger, 2013), reduces medical errors (Brown, Borowitz, & Novicoff, 2004; Flynn & McGuinness, 2011; Norbert & Lwoga, 2013), increases patients' satisfaction of health care (Davies, 2011; Heale, Khalifa, Stone, Nelson, & Del Fiol, 2017; Norbert & Lwoga, 2013), results in high‐quality medical services and solves various health questions (Norbert & Lwoga, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While some literature indicates inclusion of precision medicine and PGx in medical curricula,151153 it is unclear how consistent or to what depth this subject is taught. In some cases, patients may share PGx results ordered by specialists with their general pediatrician, who may not be prepared to integrate the findings into practice, and online resources about PGx are not easily located through search queries 154. Thus, to address knowledge gaps and acknowledge varied learning styles, multiple modes of information delivery are likely needed to increase providers’ knowledge and comfort in delivering PGx testing, such as immersive learning opportunities and traditional continuing medical education (e.g., workshops, online modules, print) 155,156…”
Section: Weighing the Benefits And Risks Of Pgx Testing In Childrenmentioning
confidence: 99%