Physicians’ opinions regarding the criteria for resuming oral intake after aspiration pneumonia: A questionnaire survey and cluster analysis of hospitals across Japan
Abstract:Physicians consider several criteria during decision-making regarding oral intake resumption, which can be assigned to two clusters. Future studies are required to develop generalizable and objective criteria. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2017; 17: 810-818.
“…We strongly agree with this result, and we believe that the fasting duration for aspiration pneumonia treatment should be as short as possible. In addition, in our previous study (Kenzaka et al 2016), we considered several criteria, including the level of consciousness, oxygen saturation (SpO 2 ), the discretion of the attending physician, body temperature, swallowing function test results, mental state, and respiratory rate, during decision-making regarding oral intake resumption.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, to the best of our knowledge, there are few published English-or Japanese-language studies with regard to the fasting duration for the treatment of patients with aspiration pneumonia (Koyama et al 2015;Maeda et al 2016). Therefore, we conducted the present study to assess the opinions of clinicians regarding the fasting duration for the treatment of patients with aspiration pneumonia and the actual medical practice with regard to oral ingestion in hospitalized patients with aspiration pneumonia by using the same database as in our previous study (Kenzaka et al 2016).…”
In Japan, aspiration pneumonia is common among the elderly and patients are often treated by temporary discontinuation of meals. However, there are few published studies on the fasting duration for aspiration pneumonia treatment. Therefore, we conducted the present study to assess the opinions of clinicians regarding the fasting duration for the treatment of patients with aspiration pneumonia and the actual medical practice with regard to oral ingestion in hospitalized patients with aspiration pneumonia. We targeted hospitals with internal medicine and respiratory medicine departments across Japan. A questionnaire regarding the fasting duration for aspiration pneumonia treatment and oral ingestion in hospitalized patients with aspiration pneumonia was mailed to physicians treating patients with pneumonia at 2,490 hospitals. We received appropriate responses from 350 facilities (response rate, 14.1%). Most clinicians (78.3%) responded that it best to keep the fasting duration for treatment as short as possible and considered that fasting is absolutely unnecessary. Regarding oral ingestion in hospitalized patients, more than 25% of clinicians restricted oral intake for a certain number of days. The majority of these clinicians (53.3%) preferred prolonged fasting for 3 to 7 days. Although most physicians preferred the fasting duration to be as short as possible, there was a difference between the ideal and actual scenarios in reintroducing oral intake early in patients with aspiration pneumonia. Improving physicians' knowledge and experience will bridge the gap between the ideal situation and what currently occurs. Further studies should investigate the acceptable fasting duration for the treatment of aspiration pneumonia.
“…We strongly agree with this result, and we believe that the fasting duration for aspiration pneumonia treatment should be as short as possible. In addition, in our previous study (Kenzaka et al 2016), we considered several criteria, including the level of consciousness, oxygen saturation (SpO 2 ), the discretion of the attending physician, body temperature, swallowing function test results, mental state, and respiratory rate, during decision-making regarding oral intake resumption.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, to the best of our knowledge, there are few published English-or Japanese-language studies with regard to the fasting duration for the treatment of patients with aspiration pneumonia (Koyama et al 2015;Maeda et al 2016). Therefore, we conducted the present study to assess the opinions of clinicians regarding the fasting duration for the treatment of patients with aspiration pneumonia and the actual medical practice with regard to oral ingestion in hospitalized patients with aspiration pneumonia by using the same database as in our previous study (Kenzaka et al 2016).…”
In Japan, aspiration pneumonia is common among the elderly and patients are often treated by temporary discontinuation of meals. However, there are few published studies on the fasting duration for aspiration pneumonia treatment. Therefore, we conducted the present study to assess the opinions of clinicians regarding the fasting duration for the treatment of patients with aspiration pneumonia and the actual medical practice with regard to oral ingestion in hospitalized patients with aspiration pneumonia. We targeted hospitals with internal medicine and respiratory medicine departments across Japan. A questionnaire regarding the fasting duration for aspiration pneumonia treatment and oral ingestion in hospitalized patients with aspiration pneumonia was mailed to physicians treating patients with pneumonia at 2,490 hospitals. We received appropriate responses from 350 facilities (response rate, 14.1%). Most clinicians (78.3%) responded that it best to keep the fasting duration for treatment as short as possible and considered that fasting is absolutely unnecessary. Regarding oral ingestion in hospitalized patients, more than 25% of clinicians restricted oral intake for a certain number of days. The majority of these clinicians (53.3%) preferred prolonged fasting for 3 to 7 days. Although most physicians preferred the fasting duration to be as short as possible, there was a difference between the ideal and actual scenarios in reintroducing oral intake early in patients with aspiration pneumonia. Improving physicians' knowledge and experience will bridge the gap between the ideal situation and what currently occurs. Further studies should investigate the acceptable fasting duration for the treatment of aspiration pneumonia.
“…Returning the administered questionnaire was considered as consent to participate by the participants. Details regarding fasting duration and resumption of oral intake following aspiration pneumonia have been published previously …”
BackgroundWe compared the quality of care for nursing‐ and healthcare‐associated pneumonia (NHCAP) and aspiration pneumonia provided by general physicians and pulmonologists.MethodsQuestionnaires were mailed to 2490 medical facilities across Japan. The questionnaire assessed participants’ implementation of microbiological investigations for NHCAP or aspiration pneumonia, as well as steps taken to prevent pneumonia recurrence (eg, use or discontinuation of drugs associated with swallowing and administration of pneumococcal polysaccharides). Survey results were statistically compared between the two groups using chi‐square tests.ResultsWe received responses from 350 hospitals; of those, medical care for aspiration pneumonia was provided by pulmonologists at 190 hospitals and by general physicians at 79 hospitals. No significant differences were observed between the two groups of physicians for any of the items regarding proactive microbiological investigations or measures for preventing pneumonia recurrence. However, general physicians tended to be more proactive in conducting Gram's stains for sputum, sputum culture inspections, and blood culture tests. They also were more likely to implement measures for preventing pneumonia recurrence such as striving to increase patients’ consciousness levels, reducing medication doses, and discontinuing drugs that cause difficulty with swallowing (response rates of “is done in nearly all cases” were 73.4%, 88.6%, 36.7%, 35.4%, and 40.5%, respectively).ConclusionsThe quality of care provided by general physicians may be on par with pulmonologists in terms of proactive microbiological investigations and preventing pneumonia recurrence.
“…Given this, adequately predicting the acquisition of oral intake and appropriate management of hospitalized older patients with pneumonia are very important. However, there are no standard criteria for the decision regarding oral intake for patients with pneumonia, and the method of oral intake resumption is based on the attending clinician's judgment and experience . Few studies investigating the relationship between dysphagia and the achievement of oral intake in older hospitalized patients with pneumonia have been reported.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there are no standard criteria for the decision regarding oral intake for patients with pneumonia, and the method of oral intake resumption is based on the attending clinician's judgment and experience. 7 Few studies investigating the relationship between dysphagia and the achievement of oral intake in older hospitalized patients with pneumonia have been reported. Momosaki et al examined the predictors for the initiation of total oral intake after AP in older adults.…”
Aspiration on videofluoroscopy, swallowing status before admission, nutritional status and duration of non-oral intake are important factors for acquiring oral intake. These results might be helpful for the management of older patients with aspiration pneumonia. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2018; 18: 1469-1473.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.