2021
DOI: 10.2147/pgpm.s307694
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physicians’ Knowledge and Attitudes Regarding Point-of-Care Pharmacogenetic Testing: A Hospital-Based Cross-Sectional Study

Abstract: Introduction Pharmacogenetic testing (PGx) is a diagnostic technique used by physicians to determine the possible reactions of patients to drug treatment on the basis of their genetic makeup. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of physicians’ awareness, attitudes, and sociodemographics on the adoption of point-of-care (POC) PGx testing as a diagnostic method, as well as the impact of their knowledge, attitudes, and sociodemographics on its adoption. Methods … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(60 reference statements)
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is possible that the findings may not be generalizable to all HCPs and consumers in oncology as there is evidence that differences exist in the knowledge and practices across different subspecialities, professions, and work settings. 26,29,35 In line with previous studies in noncancer-specific settings, 15,[43][44][45] the results of this systematic review reinforce the notion that utility of PGx testing in oncology is perceived positively by both HCPs and patients. Costs and lack of insurance coverage were found to be the main barriers in adoption of PGx testing in oncology.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…It is possible that the findings may not be generalizable to all HCPs and consumers in oncology as there is evidence that differences exist in the knowledge and practices across different subspecialities, professions, and work settings. 26,29,35 In line with previous studies in noncancer-specific settings, 15,[43][44][45] the results of this systematic review reinforce the notion that utility of PGx testing in oncology is perceived positively by both HCPs and patients. Costs and lack of insurance coverage were found to be the main barriers in adoption of PGx testing in oncology.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…For example, barriers were in relation to fitting time during practice to discuss test results with patients, and misinterpretation of the data under the color-coded categories that are used in the tests reports. 24 , 31 There is a possibility that these barriers were not addressed in the present study as the majority of participants did not have actual encounters with tests reports, and therefore lacked knowledge on whether data interpretation would be challenging or time consuming.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To our knowledge, there are few country-specific studies from the Middle East that assessed perceptions and beliefs of HCPs and students towards PGx in general. [28][29][30][31] However, for the most part, these studies were conducted in single countries, or included participants who were not directly involved in prescribing medications to treat mental health conditions. Therefore, this study adds value to the literature as it explores the readiness of the current health systems within the MENA region to practice precision medicine, especially in mental health.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations