Physician–Patient Language Discordance and Poor Health Outcomes: A Systematic Scoping Review

Abstract

Objective: This systematic review assessed whether physician–patient language concordance, compared with discordance, is associated with better health outcomes.Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted, without language restrictions, using PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and PsycINFO, from inception to July 2020. We included studies that evaluated the effects of physician–patient language concordance on health outcomes. Articles were screened, selected, and data-extracted in duplicate. Review protocol was prospectively registered (PROSPERO, CRD42020157229).Results: There were 541 citations identified through databases and eight citations through reverse search and Google Scholar. A total of 15 articles (84,750 participants) were included reporting outcomes within five domains: diabetes care (four studies), inpatient care (five studies), cancer screening (three studies), healthcare counseling (two studies), and mental health care (one study). Ten studies were of good quality, four were fair, and one was poor, according to the modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Eight studies (53%) showed a significant negative association between language discordance and at least one clinical outcome. Five studies (33%) found no association.Conclusion: Over half the evidence collated showed that physician–patient language concordance was associated with better health clinical outcomes.

Strategies For Enhancing Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion in Medical School Admissions–A Canadian Medical School's Journey

“…Patients with limitations in English proficiency within English-speaking countries experience higher rates of adverse medication reactions and more serious adverse events, when compared to English proficient patients and these issues are often ascribed to the patient being a "poor historian" rather than communication barriers on the part of physicians (57)(58)(59). Interestingly, patient-physician language concordance may be associated with improvement in certain health parameters such as glycemic control and mental health (60). The multipronged approach at Schulich Medicine resulted in an 18% increase in racialized students and 20% increase in language diversity within 2 years.…”

Nurse-patient communication on the south Texas border: Negotiating language and cultural discordance during the COVID-19 pandemic

“…Amplifying the growing frustration from non-bilingual speaking nurses like Mary who self-identify as "good nurses", the literature suggests language discordant clinical encounters can seriously compromise quality of care for patients (Cano-Ibañez et al, 2021). In their study detailing bilingual nurses' perceptions of providing language concordant care to LEP patients, Ali and Johnson (2016) found that language concordance is vital and "improves patients' experience, increases their comfort, makes them feel listened to and enhances their satisfaction with the healthcare service" (p. 422).…”

Language and Health (In)Equity in US Latinx Communities

“…Most studies show that linguistically concordant care improves health outcomes. 2,3 Linguistically discordant care often leads to patient dissatisfaction, lower quality of care, inappropriate follow-up, and worse health outcomes. 4,5 That is, care in a language other than that preferred by the patient can "expose" poorer quality care and lead to deleterious or disparate outcomes.…”