2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2012.11.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physician–patient–companion communication and decision-making: A systematic review of triadic medical consultations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

20
317
2
16

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 321 publications
(355 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
20
317
2
16
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been rigorously developed, informed by our own program of research [4,13,33]; as well as a comprehensive review of other relevant empirical, conceptual, ethical, and legal publications, and iterative feedback from an advisory group of experts in ethics, medical oncology, psychology, and theory development. These strong empirical foundations underpinning the TRIO Framework enhance the validity and clinical relevance of the TRIO Framework, with several empirical examples derived from our interview [4] and consultation transcript [13] studies used to test the Framework's effectiveness in depicting the real behaviours and dynamics occurring during triadic DM.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It has been rigorously developed, informed by our own program of research [4,13,33]; as well as a comprehensive review of other relevant empirical, conceptual, ethical, and legal publications, and iterative feedback from an advisory group of experts in ethics, medical oncology, psychology, and theory development. These strong empirical foundations underpinning the TRIO Framework enhance the validity and clinical relevance of the TRIO Framework, with several empirical examples derived from our interview [4] and consultation transcript [13] studies used to test the Framework's effectiveness in depicting the real behaviours and dynamics occurring during triadic DM.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mapping the selected data sources (Phase 1) was achieved through conducting a systematic review of empirical studies examining clinician-patient-family caregiver communication and DM [33] as well as reviewing relevant conceptual, ethical, and legal perspectives on family caregiver involvement in DM [34]. Relevant data from qualitative interviews with oncology clinicians, patients, and family caregivers [4] and interaction analyses of triadic consultation audiotapes [13], were also appraised.…”
Section: Phases 1-2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In keeping with the conclusion of a recent review, the doctor may also need explicitly to discuss the desired level of involvement and roles of the companion in the consultation when a seizure witness (or other companion) accompanies the patient [38]. In order to optimise the diagnostic potential of information available from patients, doctors may want to consider initially talking to patients on their own before asking seizure witnesses to join the consultation.…”
Section: Practice Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recognizing the unrelenting sociocognitive demands on all parties at the point-of-care, interventions have been mounted to improve disease management and decision-making. 14 Whether directed at physicians (coaching, retreats) and/or patients and caregivers (coaching, question prompt lists, decision aids, interactive multimedia computer programs), these interventions presume that some patterns of interaction at the pointof-care are better than others.…”
Section: On-the-job Training For Allmentioning
confidence: 99%