2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-019-06711-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physician opinions on decision making for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) feeding tube placement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Increased risk of feeding tube placement was observed in those with greater cognitive impairment and ADL dependence, suggesting these patients were at more advanced stages of the disease. Despite mounting evidence suggesting otherwise, 17,39,42,43 two recent surveys conducted assessing physician knowledge of feeding tubes found that >56% disagreed PEG tubes were contraindicated in patients with dementia; 62% believed that feeding tubes prevented aspiration; and 52% thought feeding tubes prevented pneumonia 44,45 . Therefore, healthcare providers may be continuing to place feeding tubes in patients with advanced dementia due to continued knowledge gaps regarding their clinical benefit.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increased risk of feeding tube placement was observed in those with greater cognitive impairment and ADL dependence, suggesting these patients were at more advanced stages of the disease. Despite mounting evidence suggesting otherwise, 17,39,42,43 two recent surveys conducted assessing physician knowledge of feeding tubes found that >56% disagreed PEG tubes were contraindicated in patients with dementia; 62% believed that feeding tubes prevented aspiration; and 52% thought feeding tubes prevented pneumonia 44,45 . Therefore, healthcare providers may be continuing to place feeding tubes in patients with advanced dementia due to continued knowledge gaps regarding their clinical benefit.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In carrying out this review it was possible to see how the decision to start enteral nutrition in dementia (especially in its advanced stage), is often controversial and influenced by clinical reasons, by the context in which we are called to operate, or by the doubtful availability and legitimacy of advance directives for the treatment of patients. 28 Moreover, cultural-religious convictions of health personnel and family members, emotional experience linked to the illness, and legal implications are among the most important factors to take in account. 29 The choice to perform this procedure becomes complex in the case in which it must be operated against a person suffering from cognitive impairment, or where the patient's involvement is limited by the underlying pathology, since it becomes necessary to reconstruct the will, guaranteeing compliance with the system of the values, of the convictions that he expressed during his life, as the dementia patient must be recognized as a person, at every stage of his illness, regardless of the change in cognitive conditions, gradual or immediate or change of personality and behavior.…”
Section: Ethical and Legal Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If it is started it must be interrupted if it causes complications or symptoms to the patient. 28,30 The role of nurses in the enteral nutrition in dementia tions and in supporting caregivers. 31 According to the new deontological Italian code …the nurse enhances and welcomes the person's contribution, his point of view and his emotions and facilitates the expression of suffering.…”
Section: Ethical and Legal Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%