Physician Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behavior Related to Reporting Adverse Drug Events

Rogers, Audrey Smith; Israel, Ebenezer; Smith, Craig R.; Levine, Douglas W.; McBean, A. Marshall; Valente, Cristina; Faich, Gerald A.

doi:10.1001/archinte.1988.00380070090021

Cited by 110 publications

(24 citation statements)

References 9 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Principles 2, 3, and 4 refer to the expectancy, instrumentality, and valence components of expectancy theory. These components mesh well with the literature's emphasis on easy-to-use, time-efficient, accessible, and understandable reporting systems whose use lead to observable and useful outcomes as a result of feedback and follow-up (Johnson 2003b, Rogers et al 1988, Barach and Small 2000, HamiltonEscoto et al 2006. In summary, needs classification theories conceptualise motivation as stemming from physical and psychological needs, whereas process theories imply evaluative cognitive processes.…”

Section: Process Theories Of Motivationmentioning

confidence: 60%

“…Indeed, organisational climate and culture, peer and supervisor opinions, personal standards, social conventions, government policy, organisational and professional pressure, ethical obligations, and other normative influences are key issues in error reporting (Rogers et al 1988, Kingston et al 2004, HamiltonEscoto et al 2006). This is one reason why a 'just' culture and a climate of safety may be prerequisites for reporting (Marx 1999, Kaplan 2003.…”

Section: Theories Of Planned Behaviourmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A theoretical model of health information technology usage behaviour with implications for patient safety

Holden

Karsh

2009

Behaviour & Information Technology

110

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Primary objective: much research and practice related to the design and implementation of information technology in health care has been atheoretical. It is argued that using extant theory to develop testable models of health information technology (HIT) benefits both research and practice. Methods and procedures: several theories of motivation, decision making, and technology acceptance are reviewed and associated theory-based principles of HIT usage behaviour are produced. Main outcomes and results: the case of medical error reporting technology is used to support the validity of the proposed HIT usage behaviour principles. Further, combining these principles produces a testable, theoretical multilevel model of HIT usage behaviour. The model provides an alternative to atheoretical research and practice related to HIT. Conclusions: developing, testing, and revising models of HIT like the one presented here is suggested to be beneficial to researchers and practitioners alike.

show abstract

Section: Process Theories Of Motivationmentioning

confidence: 60%

Section: Theories Of Planned Behaviourmentioning

confidence: 99%

A theoretical model of health information technology usage behaviour with implications for patient safety

Holden

Karsh

2009

Behaviour & Information Technology

110

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Many studies about the factors that influence ADR under-reporting have been conducted on physicians [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27]. Of the few studies that have focused on under-reporting among pharmacists [28][29][30][31][32], only four studies [22,24,31,32] adequately described their study design (all four were case-control studies).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Factors that affect adverse drug reaction reporting among hospital pharmacists in Western China

et al. 2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Although studies have assessed physicians' awareness and use of national reporting systems in the United States ( Leape, 2002 ;Pushkin, Frassetto, Tsourounis, Segal, & Kim, 2010 ;Rogers et al, 1988 ), few have assessed the awareness of nurse practitioners (NPs) and physician assistants (PAs) ( Ehrenpreis, Sifuentes, Ehrenpreis, Smith, & Marshall, 2012 ). Because of the increasing amount of time NPs and PAs spend in direct patient contact, these two categories of healthcare providers are important sources of adverse event reports ( American Academy of Physician Assistants, 2008 ;Atwater, Bednar, Hassman, & Khouri, 2008 ;Auerbach, 2012 ;Bodenheimer & Pham, 2010 ;Carpenter, Gregg, Owens, Buchman, & Coopersmith, 2012 ;Kane, Flood, Keckhafer, & Rockwood, 2001 ).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Attitudes and Usage of the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System Among Gastroenterology Nurse Practitioners and Physician Assistants

Salk

Ehrenpreis

2016

Gastroenterology Nursing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) is used for postmarketing pharmacovigilance. Our study sought to assess attitudes and usage of the FAERS among gastroenterology nurse practitioners (NPs) and physician assistants (PAs). A survey was administered at the August 2012 Principles of Gastroenterology for the Nurse Practitioner and Physician Assistant course, held in Chicago, IL. Of the 128 respondents, 123 (96%) reported a specialty in gastroenterology or hepatology and were included in analysis. Eighty-nine participants were NPs and 32 PAs, whereas 2 did not report their profession. Although 119 (98%) agreed or strongly agreed with the statement that accurately reporting adverse drug reactions is an important process to optimize patient safety, the majority of participants (54% NPs and 81% PAs) were unfamiliar with the FAERS. In addition, only 20% of NPs and 9% of PAs reported learning about the FAERS in NP or PA schooling. Our study shows enthusiasm among gastroenterology NPs and PAs for the reporting of adverse drug reactions, coupled with a lack of familiarity with the FAERS. This presents an opportunity for enhanced education about reporting of adverse drug reactions for gastroenterology NPs and PAs.

show abstract

Physician Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behavior Related to Reporting Adverse Drug Events

Cited by 110 publications

References 9 publications

A theoretical model of health information technology usage behaviour with implications for patient safety

A theoretical model of health information technology usage behaviour with implications for patient safety

Factors that affect adverse drug reaction reporting among hospital pharmacists in Western China

Attitudes and Usage of the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System Among Gastroenterology Nurse Practitioners and Physician Assistants

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About