Abstract:Little is known about the ability of incentives to influence decisions by physicians regarding choices of settings for care delivery. In the context of outpatient procedural care, the emergence of freestanding ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs) as alternatives to hospital-based outpatient departments (HOPDs) creates a unique opportunity to study this question. We advance a model where physicians' division of labor between ASCs and HOPDs affects the medical complexity of patients treated in low-acuity settings (… Show more
“…Specific CPT code indicators are not used because of potential upcoding or differences in coding by provider. 14 Using this sample of physicians is consistent with findings from David and Neuman (2011), whose results suggested that physicians who split patients between ASCs and hospital outpatient departments were observed to sort their more severe cases to hospitals and their less severe cases to ASCs. 15 While other contracts between facilities and physicians may exist, they are unobservable to the researcher.…”
Section: Patient Case Complexitysupporting
confidence: 80%
“…7 There are several mechanisms through 5 Winter (2003) has shown that ASCs treat less complex and less costly cases than hospitals. However, David and Neuman (2011) find that physicians who largely refer patients to ASCs treat more medically complex cases than physicians who refer to both hospital outpatient departments and ASCs. 6 Throughout this paper, hospital outpatient departments are referred to as hospitals.…”
Section: Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Further, physician costs are endogenous. equipped to handle more complex cases, instead of ASCs, which is evidenced by David and Neuman (2011) and Winter (2003).…”
“…Specific CPT code indicators are not used because of potential upcoding or differences in coding by provider. 14 Using this sample of physicians is consistent with findings from David and Neuman (2011), whose results suggested that physicians who split patients between ASCs and hospital outpatient departments were observed to sort their more severe cases to hospitals and their less severe cases to ASCs. 15 While other contracts between facilities and physicians may exist, they are unobservable to the researcher.…”
Section: Patient Case Complexitysupporting
confidence: 80%
“…7 There are several mechanisms through 5 Winter (2003) has shown that ASCs treat less complex and less costly cases than hospitals. However, David and Neuman (2011) find that physicians who largely refer patients to ASCs treat more medically complex cases than physicians who refer to both hospital outpatient departments and ASCs. 6 Throughout this paper, hospital outpatient departments are referred to as hospitals.…”
Section: Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Further, physician costs are endogenous. equipped to handle more complex cases, instead of ASCs, which is evidenced by David and Neuman (2011) and Winter (2003).…”
“…Also, higher population in a patient's zip code is correlated with a lower likelihood of traveling further. This result echos repeated findings in the healthcare literature (see for example Gaynor and Vogt [2003], David and Neuman [2011], Capps, Dranove and Lindrooth [2010], and Town and Vistnes [2001]) that distance matters to healthcare consumers. 15 As well as across insurance types, see analogous results for private patients with and without fixed effects in the appendix and tables A.VI, A.VII and A.VIII.…”
Section: V(i) Multinomial Logit Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Also, higher population in a patient's zip code is correlated with a lower likelihood of traveling further. This result echos repeated findings in the healthcare literature (see for example Gaynor and Vogt [], David and Neuman [], Capps, Dranove and Lindrooth [], and Town and Vistnes []) that distance matters to healthcare consumers.…”
This paper studies competition between healthcare facilities, particularly between hospitals and ambulatory surgery centers (ASC's), in the market for outpatient surgery. The goal is to answer questions about the existence and magnitude of welfare gains earned from the use of ASC's. These questions are relevant to current policy debates about the usefulness of ASC's. I calculate welfare by specifying a multinomial logit model of consumer demand for healthcare facilities, and estimating structural elements of demand functions. Total elimination of ASC's results in between 10.2 and 28.1 minutes of welfare loss per patient surgery.
ImportanceIn surgical patients, it is well known that higher hospital procedure volume is associated with better outcomes. To our knowledge, this volume-outcome association has not been studied in ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs) in the US.ObjectiveTo determine if low-volume ASCs have a higher rate of revisits after surgery, particularly among patients with multimorbidity.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis matched case-control study used Medicare claims data and analyzed surgeries performed during 2018 and 2019 at ASCs. The study examined 2328 ASCs performing common ambulatory procedures and analyzed 4751 patients with a revisit within 7 days of surgery (defined to be either 1 of 4735 revisits or 1 of 16 deaths without a revisit). These cases were each closely matched to 5 control patients without revisits (23 755 controls). Data were analyzed from January 1, 2018, through December 31, 2019.Main Outcomes and MeasuresSeven-day revisit in patients (cases) compared with the matched patients without the outcome (controls) in ASCs with low volume (less than 50 procedures over 2 years) vs higher volume (50 or more procedures).ResultsPatients at a low-volume ASC had a higher odds of a 7-day revisit vs patients who had their surgery at a higher-volume ASC (odds ratio [OR], 1.21; 95% CI, 1.09-1.36; P = .001). The odds of revisit for patients with multimorbidity were higher at low-volume ASCs when compared with higher-volume ASCs (OR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.27-1.94; P < .001). Among patients with multimorbidity in low-volume ASCs, for those who underwent orthopedic procedures, the odds of revisit were 84% higher (OR, 1.84; 95% CI, 1.36-2.50; P < .001) vs higher-volume centers, and for those who underwent general surgery or other procedures, the odds of revisit were 36% higher (OR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.01-1.83; P = .05) vs a higher-volume center. The findings were not statistically significant for patients without multimorbidity.Conclusions and RelevanceIn this observational study, the surgical volume of an ASC was an important indicator of patient outcomes. Older patients with multimorbidity should discuss with their surgeon the optimal location of their care.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.