2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.amc.2009.04.062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physically-relativized Church–Turing Hypotheses: Physical foundations of computing and complexity theory of computational physics

Abstract: Abstract. We turn 'the' Church-Turing Hypothesis from an ambiguous source of sensational speculations into a (collection of) sound and well-defined scientific problem(s):Examining recent controversies, and causes for misunderstanding, concerning the state of the ChurchTuring Hypothesis (CTH), suggests to study the CTH relative to an arbitrary but specific physical theory-rather than vaguely referring to "nature" in general. To this end we combine (and compare) physical structuralism with (models of computation… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Once again, to avoid singularity of u m (s) at s = 0, we begin with the following estimate: Let 0 < ǫ < t n . Then it follows from Fact 5-(1), (2), (5), (27), (30), and a similar calculation as performed in Claim I that → 0 effectively as n → ∞ (recall that t n = t/2 n ). The proof for the claim II, and thus for the lemma is now complete.…”
Section: Proof Of Propositionmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Once again, to avoid singularity of u m (s) at s = 0, we begin with the following estimate: Let 0 < ǫ < t n . Then it follows from Fact 5-(1), (2), (5), (27), (30), and a similar calculation as performed in Claim I that → 0 effectively as n → ∞ (recall that t n = t/2 n ). The proof for the claim II, and thus for the lemma is now complete.…”
Section: Proof Of Propositionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Its validity had been challenged, though, in the sound setting of Recursive Analysis: with a computable C 1 initial condition to the Wave Equation leading to an incomputable solution [11,13]. The controversy was later resolved by demonstrating that, in both physically [30,1] and mathematically more appropriate Sobolev space settings, the solution is computable uniformly in the initial data [23]. Recall that functions f in a Sobolev space are not defined pointwise but by local averages in the L q sense 4 (in particular q = 2 corresponding to energy) with derivatives understood in the distributional sense.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The theory T is everywhere and so we are actually studying T -computability and T -computational complexity. Our approach has been applied in a new discussion of the physical basis of the Church-Turing Thesis in Ziegler [17].…”
Section: Principle 3 Mapping the Border Between Computer And Hypercomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These are large questions with controversial answers -see, for instance, Geroch and Hartle (1986), Kreisel (1974), Moore (1990), Yao (2003), Németi and Dávid (2006), Odifreddi (1989) and Ziegler (2009). In the restricted case of our theory of physical oracles, having investigated physical systems drawn from several branches of Physics, we currently expect that physical experiments with continuous behaviour exhibit a computational power in polynomial time of P /log * .…”
Section: Implications For the Stability Of Computation By Physical Momentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The methodology of our programme has been used to analyse Church-Turing theses in Ziegler (2009). Our methodology, which is based on four principles and a carefully specified theory T , requires a reformulation of the informal thesis in Section 8.2 in which the theory T is explicit.…”
Section: In Search Of a Church-turing Thesis For Physical Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%