2008
DOI: 10.3763/aber.2008.0203
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physically Based Modelling of the Material and Gaseous Contaminant Interactions in Buildings: Models, Experimental Data and Future Developments

Abstract: Although potentially having a significant influence on indoor air quality (IAQ), interactions between building materials and gaseous contaminants have often been neglected or crudely modelled in IAQ simulation tools. During the past 20 years, empirical source and sink models have progressively given way to physically based models; but confusion still remains on their applicability, as well as on the adequate experimental data to input for the model parameters. Thus, demonstration is first made that models rela… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, several indoor measurement campaigns did not give enough details about the experimental condi ons and the geometries of indoor surfaces. Recently, Mendez et al 37 implemented in INCA-Indoor a scheme proposed by Blondeau et al 52 involving the use of the mass transfer coefficients from indoor air into a boundary layer near the surfaces. The thickness of the boundary layer is calculated depending on parameters such as the room characteris cs, the air velocity, and the characteris c length of the material.…”
Section: Uptake Limita On Due To Transportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, several indoor measurement campaigns did not give enough details about the experimental condi ons and the geometries of indoor surfaces. Recently, Mendez et al 37 implemented in INCA-Indoor a scheme proposed by Blondeau et al 52 involving the use of the mass transfer coefficients from indoor air into a boundary layer near the surfaces. The thickness of the boundary layer is calculated depending on parameters such as the room characteris cs, the air velocity, and the characteris c length of the material.…”
Section: Uptake Limita On Due To Transportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The values obtained by the two methods are in the same order of magnitude, but the diffusion coefficient by dual chamber was larger than that using the MIP method. Possible reasons may include, but are not limited to: (i) uncertainties in both the MIP and dual chamber measurements; and (ii) possible surface diffusion that is not accounted for in the calculation based on the MIP measured pore volume distribution [20]. Further investigation into this is needed.…”
Section: Comparison Of Voc Diffusion With Mercury Intrusion Porosimetrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The objective of this study was to develop a novel method for determining initial VOC concentrations and the sorption isotherm. A dual chamber method for determining the diffusion coefficient was developed by Xu et al [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%