Physical Training effectiveness and Tolerance in Patients after Myocardial Infraction, Depending on the Initial Physical activity Tolerance

Abstract

Aim. To investigate exercise tolerance in patients undergoing acute coronary syndrome with outcome in myocardial infarction, dependingon physical activity tolerance. Material and methods. We studied 80 patients aged from 40 to 75 years old who were admitted from primary vascular centers for athree-week rehabilitation course to the department of medical rehabilitation for patients with somatic diseases of the clinic of the IvanovoState Medical University of the Ministry of Health of Russia, of which 61 were men (76,3%) and 19 women (23,7%). In accordancewith the aim of the study, a 6-minute walk test was performed in all patients before and after the completion of the rehabilitationcourse. Based on the test results, physical exercise tolerance was assessed and the functional class (FC) of coronary heart disease (CHD) was determined. The patients with I class coronary heart disease (CHD) in the number of 20 patients (25%) made up the 1st group, 21patients (26,3%) with II class – the 2nd group, 21 patients (26,3%) with III class – the 3rd group, and 18 patients (22,5%) with IV class– the 4th group. Results. Every third patient who was admitted to a 3-week cardiac rehabilitation course had short-term adverse reactionson loading during physical training on simulators. Most cases of inadequate reactions were noted in patients with III and IV IHDclass III (according to the 6-minute walk test) having, according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health(ICF), moderate and pronounced reduction of exercise tolerance function. Patients often had tachycardic and hypertensive reactionsin the porcess of prysical training on stimulators and some patients (more often those with the pronounced decrease in exercise tolerancefunction) had hypotensive reaction which is the most unfavorable type of response to the load. In the vast majority of patientswith I and II CHF with no impairment or mild decrease in exercise tolerance according to ICF, an adequate response of hemodynamicparameters to exercise was determined. Adverse reactions were observed only in every fifth-seventh patient and were manifested onlyin the form of tachycardic and hypertensive reactions to exercise. The study analyzed the effectiveness of rehabilitation measures inthe groups of patients with different levels of tolerance to physical activity. It was found out that all the patients with myocardial infarction,regardless of the initial level, had increased exercise tolerance after cardiac rehabilitation. Conclusion. The 6-minute walk test is insufficiently informative for patients with markedly reduced tolerance to physical activity. The«gold standard» of qualitative and quantitative assessment of reactions and interaction between cardiovascular and respiratory systems,as well as metabolic response of the body during physical activity for these patients is the spiroergometric study.

[Retracted] Application of Biomechanics Based on Intelligent Technology and Big Data in Physical Fitness Training of Athletes

“…In the actual analysis of the abovementioned relevant index data, the whole analysis process becomes more complicated due to the existence of certain connections between the variables. Therefore, it is necessary to use factor analysis to process the obtained data, simplify the analysis process, and make the analysis results simpler and clearer [ 15 ]. The specific process is as follows: First, the data that are determined to participate in factor analysis are sorted, then the R-type matrix of the relevant data is obtained, and the KMO moderate test and Bartlett's sphericity test are carried out on it.…”

Effects of Physical Training on Cyclists’ Speed

“…3 The Wingate test was carried out 10 days before the training started, 14 athletes were ranked from high to low according to the relative value of maximum power (W/kg) measured and numbered from 1 to 14, two players with similar abilities were divided into one group, a total of 7 groups were obtained, using a paired design method, two athletes in each group were divided into a constant number of cycling group (CG) and a reduced number of cycling group (DG), with 7 athletes in each group. 4 Before the start of the study, the athletes were mainly explained the purpose and significance of the study, the procedures and precautions of each functional test and training, and familiarized themselves with the methods and steps of the test. The details of the research subjects are shown in Table 1.…”