2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2018.09.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physical simulation as a tool to understand friction stir processed X80 pipeline steel plate complex microstructures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…No fully martensitic microstructure was observed in the asbuilt walls owing to the need to achieve very high cooling rates (> 100 °C/s) which were not obtained during the buildup. M-A particles are typical microstructures in HSLA steels and are observed for cooling rates between 10 to 40°C/s and stinger-type above these rates [34]. In the case of this research, due to the subsequent heating and cooling of the deposited material it is difficult to track the M-A transformation through the fabrication process, however, mostly blocky-type structures are depicted and these coincide with the morphology reported in the literature [34][35][36].…”
Section: Microscopic Observationssupporting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…No fully martensitic microstructure was observed in the asbuilt walls owing to the need to achieve very high cooling rates (> 100 °C/s) which were not obtained during the buildup. M-A particles are typical microstructures in HSLA steels and are observed for cooling rates between 10 to 40°C/s and stinger-type above these rates [34]. In the case of this research, due to the subsequent heating and cooling of the deposited material it is difficult to track the M-A transformation through the fabrication process, however, mostly blocky-type structures are depicted and these coincide with the morphology reported in the literature [34][35][36].…”
Section: Microscopic Observationssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…M-A particles are typical microstructures in HSLA steels and are observed for cooling rates between 10 to 40°C/s and stinger-type above these rates [34]. In the case of this research, due to the subsequent heating and cooling of the deposited material it is difficult to track the M-A transformation through the fabrication process, however, mostly blocky-type structures are depicted and these coincide with the morphology reported in the literature [34][35][36]. The formation of M-A microstructures in low-alloyed steel is attributed to an incomplete transformation from austenite to martensite in the HAZ after reheating to intercritical temperatures [35].…”
Section: Microscopic Observationsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The secondary phases (SP) were quantified in the area image, which was extrapolated to volume percentage. Notice that SP and constituents are divided into martensite-austenite (MA), degenerated pearlite (DP), bainite (B), and martensite (M), and their presence depends on the cooling rate [26,27].…”
Section: Microstructural Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the high cooling rates after FSW, the SP tends to be finer than under slow cooling rates. Rapid cooling rates favor bainitic products, and slow cooling rates the formation of polygonal and quasi-polygonal products [26].…”
Section: Microstructural Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation