2024
DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.adi8594
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physical science research needed to evaluate the viability and risks of marine cloud brightening

Graham Feingold,
Virendra P. Ghate,
Lynn M. Russell
et al.

Abstract: Marine cloud brightening (MCB) is the deliberate injection of aerosol particles into shallow marine clouds to increase their reflection of solar radiation and reduce the amount of energy absorbed by the climate system. From the physical science perspective, the consensus of a broad international group of scientists is that the viability of MCB will ultimately depend on whether observations and models can robustly assess the scale-up of local-to-global brightening in today’s climate and identify strategies that… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 129 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This statement is by no means an endorsement of MCB as a viable climate intervention method. Much more solid research is needed at this stage to determine the viability of MCB and to quantify the potential risks associated with it (Feingold et al, 2024).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This statement is by no means an endorsement of MCB as a viable climate intervention method. Much more solid research is needed at this stage to determine the viability of MCB and to quantify the potential risks associated with it (Feingold et al, 2024).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, if marine cloud brightening (MCB) were to be attempted our findings imply a strong, regionally-dependent masking of MCB detectability by the natural variability in cloud radiative effect, and that an ambitious seeding strategy might be required. The low detectability of the radiative perturbation from IMO2020 at scales larger than ship track or shipping lane speaks to the substantial challenge in validating the viability of MCB at regional-to-global scales 34,35 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, significant IMO2020 perturbations can be masked by overwhelmingly large natural variability in cloud properties, leading to a "missed detection". Both these scenarios underscore an important confounding effect of natural variability on the detectability of natural or deliberate perturbations to the aerosol field, with the latter being a critical "checkpoint" for the viability of marine cloud brightening 34,35 .…”
Section: Natural Variability Masks Detectability Of the Imo2020-pertu...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lastly, despite the insights gained from nocturnal simulations, the daytime behavior of marine stratocumulus population needs to be explored to understand the shortwave radiative effects of these clouds, which are more relevant to aerosol-cloud climate forcing and issues like marine cloud brightening (Latham, 1990;Feingold et al, 2024).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%