2000
DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.504
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physical risk factors for neck pain

Abstract: Ariens GAM, van Mechelen W, Bongers PM, Bouter LM, van der Wal G. Physical risk factors for neck pain. Scand J Work Environ Health 2000;26(1):7-19.To identify physical risk factors for neck pain, a systematic review of the literature was carried out. Based on methodological quality and study design, 4 levels of evidence were defined to establish the strength of evidence for the relationship between risk factors and neck pain. Altogether, 22 cross-sectional studies, 2 prospective cohort studies, and 1 case-refe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

13
320
4
11

Year Published

2001
2001
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 462 publications
(359 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
13
320
4
11
Order By: Relevance
“…14,15 Despite the six domains of potential bias as defined by Hayden et al 15 being taken into account, there may still be bias owing to our scoring method. Namely, we scored negative in case of an unclear or missing description of the quality criterion item.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…14,15 Despite the six domains of potential bias as defined by Hayden et al 15 being taken into account, there may still be bias owing to our scoring method. Namely, we scored negative in case of an unclear or missing description of the quality criterion item.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…inconsistent outcomes). The strength of evidence was assessed according to the rating Table 1 Criteria list for assessment of methodological quality of longitudinal studies 14,15 Item definition…”
Section: Levels Of Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Work-related exposures are a determinant of these ailments (Hales and Bernard 1996) and are associated with upper-extremity (Bernard 1997, Ariens et al 2000, Messing et al 2009), back (Shipp et al 2009, CostaBlack et al 2010 and upper-and lower-limb disorders (Ranney et al 1995, Punnett andHerbert 2000). Work activities that involve heavy lifting, awkward postures, bending, twisting or stooping, prolonged sitting or standing and repetitive motions may contribute to the development of these problems (Ariens et al 2000, National Research Council 2001, Punnett and Wegman 2004. In many occupational settings, women are at higher risk of developing a number of musculoskeletal (MS) symptoms compared to men (Punnett and Herbert 2000, Treaster and Burr 2004, Wijnhoven et al 2006.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An important limitation of the literature was the overall absence of definitions of risk factors. There is great uniformity in describing the nature of the risk factors, but only one review described content of the risk factors [42]. It is not certain that reviews dealt with the same content because no definitions were presented.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%