1996
DOI: 10.1016/0370-2693(96)00685-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physical representations of Gamow states in a rigged Hilbert space

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
46
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
46
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…When he writes δ N (φ) as an integral operator, Nakanishi uses the following expression: 14) where 15) and where the contour γ is such that the integral in Eq. (B.14) decomposes into two terms.…”
Section: B3 Nakanishi's Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When he writes δ N (φ) as an integral operator, Nakanishi uses the following expression: 14) where 15) and where the contour γ is such that the integral in Eq. (B.14) decomposes into two terms.…”
Section: B3 Nakanishi's Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In three previous papers [1,2,3] we have shown that Gamow-states [4] can be interpreted as Sebastiao e Silva's Ultradistributions [5,6,7], whose proper treatment appeals to Rigged Hilbert Space [8,9,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was shown in [5,6,7,8] that resonances, i.e. Gamow-states [9,10], can be seen as (Sebastiao e Silva's) Ultradistributions [11,12,13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%