2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10118-020-2380-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physical Properties of Polymers Under Soft and Hard Nanoconfinement: A Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 168 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It also means that crystallization of the long alkyl side groups can strongly disturb both the first- and second-level structures, leading to the disordering of the structures. For crystallization from the ordered melt of crystalline-rubbery diblock copolymers, different types of crystallization, such as confined, breakout, and templated crystallization, have been observed, depending on the composition and relative segregation strength of crystallization over microphase separation. However, breakout crystallization may result in distortion or undulation of the crystalline microdomains and thus reduced ordering degree of the microphase-separated structure, which have been revealed by direct transmission electron microscopy (TEM) observations and broadened SAXS primary peaks. Sometimes, the high-order peaks may even disappear in the SAXS profile . Herein, the disordered first- and second-level structures in PEO 114 - b -P­(AOEDIm-PF 6 ) n BCPs can also be attributed to the breakout crystallization of the long alky side chains.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It also means that crystallization of the long alkyl side groups can strongly disturb both the first- and second-level structures, leading to the disordering of the structures. For crystallization from the ordered melt of crystalline-rubbery diblock copolymers, different types of crystallization, such as confined, breakout, and templated crystallization, have been observed, depending on the composition and relative segregation strength of crystallization over microphase separation. However, breakout crystallization may result in distortion or undulation of the crystalline microdomains and thus reduced ordering degree of the microphase-separated structure, which have been revealed by direct transmission electron microscopy (TEM) observations and broadened SAXS primary peaks. Sometimes, the high-order peaks may even disappear in the SAXS profile . Herein, the disordered first- and second-level structures in PEO 114 - b -P­(AOEDIm-PF 6 ) n BCPs can also be attributed to the breakout crystallization of the long alky side chains.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to dopant fixation in the film matrix at higher temperatures, thermodynamic transitions of the polymer must be taken into account. Thin polymer films manifest different behavior when exposed to increased temperatures compared to bulk systems due to their spatial confinement [ 7 ]. It has already been discovered that films with thickness below 100 nm show substantial deviation of their glass transition temperature ( T g ) [ 8 ], which is dependent on 1) the type of film, either free-standing [ 9 , 10 ] or substrate-supported [ 11 ], (2) polymer–substrate interactions that can increase the T g of a film above a bulk value and broaden its range [ 12 ], or (3) the molecular weight of the polymer [ 13 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nanoconfined material structures, including polymers as well, due to the wide range of unique structural features, properties, and effects arising under nanocompartmentalized conditions, have created significant worldwide interest over the last couple of years (see e.g., references [ 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 ] and references therein). The recently emerged polymer conetworks, especially amphiphilic conetworks (APCNs), composed of covalently or supramolecularly bonded, otherwise immiscible, hydrophilic and hydrophobic polymer chains, belong to such nanophase-separated materials with mutually nanoconfined macromolecular components [ 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%