2003
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.67.094204
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physical properties of aGeS2glass using approximateab initiomolecular dynamics

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
61
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(45 reference statements)
11
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our sample contains 258 particles, confined in a cubic cell of 19.21Å (the density corresponds thus to the experimental value of 2.75 g/cm 3 [22]. At this density the pressure of the system is fairly small (close to 0.3 GPa) and does not affect the structural and vibrational properties of glassy GeS 2 as shown in previous studies [11,23]). Periodic boundary conditions are applied in order to limit surface effects, and only the Γ point is used to sample the Brillouin zone ( k = 0).…”
Section: Theoretical Foundationsmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Our sample contains 258 particles, confined in a cubic cell of 19.21Å (the density corresponds thus to the experimental value of 2.75 g/cm 3 [22]. At this density the pressure of the system is fairly small (close to 0.3 GPa) and does not affect the structural and vibrational properties of glassy GeS 2 as shown in previous studies [11,23]). Periodic boundary conditions are applied in order to limit surface effects, and only the Γ point is used to sample the Brillouin zone ( k = 0).…”
Section: Theoretical Foundationsmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…We report in Fig.1 the results obtained for pairs of the same nature: Ge-Ge and S-S. The peaks corresponding to second neighbour distances, at 3.64Å for S-S pairs, and at 2.91Å and 3.41Å for Ge-Ge pairs (depending of whether the intertetrahedral connections are edge or corner-sharing), have already been analyzed in our previous work on the small sample [8] (in addition to the g(r) for the Ge-S pairs that does not change significantly in the large sample). However in the 258-particle sample, we observe in both graphs a small peak at short distances (2.42Å for Ge-Ge pairs and 2.23Å for S-S pairs), corresponding to nearest-neighbour bonds.…”
Section: Structural Disordermentioning
confidence: 90%
“…However, the importance of charge transfers in chalcogenide glasses [7] such as GeS 2 requires the use of an ab-initio model which can be extremely costly in time if the size of the system is not relatively small. In a previous study we have investigated a glassy GeS 2 sample containing 96 particles [8], using a non self-consistent ab-initio code based on the Sankey-Niklewski scheme called FIREBALL [9]. The good agreement of the results with the available experimental data showed the excellent quality of this model for the study of chalcogenide systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Common to all these glasses is that the normal-bonding structure consists of the tetrahedral units of Si(Ge)O(S)4/2. Nevertheless, in consistent with different bonding angles of Si(Ge)-O(S)-Si(Ge), the units in Si(Ge)O2 are connected in a corner-shared way, while GeS2 contains edge-shared connections [49], which can be regarded as 2-membered rings. On the other hand, Si(Ge)O2 are believed to contain small rings such as 3-and 4-membered [11,40], and as noted above, GeO2 may contain a little amount of GeO6/2 units [46].…”
Section: Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 91%