2010
DOI: 10.1590/s0100-06832010000100022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physical properties of a humic cambisol under tillage and cropping systems after twelve years

Abstract: Soil is the basis underlying the food production chain and it is fundamental to improve and conserve its productive capacity. Imbalanced exploitation can degrade agricultural areas physical, chemical and biologically. The objective of this study was to evaluate some soil physical properties and their relation with organic carbon contents of a Humic Dystrudept under conventional tillage (CT) and no-tillage (NT), for 12 years in rotation (r) and succession (s) cropping systems. The experiment was carried out in … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
12
0
5

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
12
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in no-tillage systems, where crop residues are left on the soil surface, this effect is the little importance, due in part, to soil cover by the crop canopy, as a result of differences in foliar density and in canopy height above the soil (Oliveira et al, 2003;Luciano et al, 2009). On the other hand, roots of different crops does differently influence soil aggregation, as mentioned by Baldissera (1985), , and Andrade et al (2010). Intercropping legumes with grasses results in greater soil protection than single cropping, according to the crop performance and the sowing period (Dornelles et al, 1997;Nolla et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in no-tillage systems, where crop residues are left on the soil surface, this effect is the little importance, due in part, to soil cover by the crop canopy, as a result of differences in foliar density and in canopy height above the soil (Oliveira et al, 2003;Luciano et al, 2009). On the other hand, roots of different crops does differently influence soil aggregation, as mentioned by Baldissera (1985), , and Andrade et al (2010). Intercropping legumes with grasses results in greater soil protection than single cropping, according to the crop performance and the sowing period (Dornelles et al, 1997;Nolla et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dry matter produced per crop (Table 2) was high in the CT, MT, and NT treatments, explained partly by the crop rotation adopted (Table 1) and partly by the regularity of rainfall without periods of marked water deficit and by the appropriate physical and chemical properties of the soil (Andrade et al, 2010;Andrade et al, 2012).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a study regarding soil characteristics after 12 years of different managements (conventional tillage and no-till), Andrade et al (2010) highlight the following: (1) the soil physical properties in no-tillage systems remain adequate for plant development; and (2) at the shallower soil layer of the no-till crop succession, soil density values were reduced. This means crop plants usually find a similar or occasionally more suitable environment for their development under no-till systems than under conventional tillage.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%