2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2012.05.092
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physical properties evaluation of various substrates coated cupric oxide thin films by dip method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The band gap value of the deposited film are found to be 2.39, 2.31 and 2.20 eV for films obtained on SnO 2 :F, SnO 2 for SnO 2 :In substrates. Variation in band gap value of the deposited films may be due to usage of different substrates [25]. The band gap value obtained in the present work must be closer to the value reported earlier [26].…”
Section: Optical Absorption Analysissupporting
confidence: 86%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The band gap value of the deposited film are found to be 2.39, 2.31 and 2.20 eV for films obtained on SnO 2 :F, SnO 2 for SnO 2 :In substrates. Variation in band gap value of the deposited films may be due to usage of different substrates [25]. The band gap value obtained in the present work must be closer to the value reported earlier [26].…”
Section: Optical Absorption Analysissupporting
confidence: 86%
“…4a-c. The observation of slight change in surface morphology may be due to usage of different substrates [25]. The grains are found to be spherical in shape with non uniform surface coverage which is indicated in Fig.…”
Section: Morphological and Compositional Analysesmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The calculated crystallite size values are provided in Table 1. The microstructural properties were estimated using relations (1) and (2) for ZnO based nanocomposites [19]. The microstrain ( ) values were calculated using…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%