2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11207-018-1384-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physical Processes Involved in the EUV “Surge” Event of 9 May 2012

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
5
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We show quantitative evidence of flux cancellation in seven cases, and infer the presence of flux cancellation in other cases based on the observed flux convergence. Although we do not rule out other possibilities, the observations of flux convergence at the base of events suggests that flux cancellation could play an important role in triggering several of these events, in accord with many recent similar findings of flux cancellation leading to jet eruptions (Huang et al 2015;Panesar et al 2016Panesar et al , 2017Tiwari et al 2016Tiwari et al , 2018Sterling et al 2017Sterling et al , 2018Panesar et al 2018a;López Fuentes et al 2018). As was first proposed by van Ballegooijen & Martens (1989) and Moore & Roumeliotis (1992), and has been observationally confirmed (e.g., Panesar et al 2016Panesar et al , 2017Panesar et al , 2018aTiwari et al 2018;Sterling et al 2018;Chintzoglou et al 2019), the process of flux cancellation (driven by converging photospheric flows) can prepare and trigger the magnetic field that explodes in a flare eruption.…”
Section: (A)supporting
confidence: 89%
“…We show quantitative evidence of flux cancellation in seven cases, and infer the presence of flux cancellation in other cases based on the observed flux convergence. Although we do not rule out other possibilities, the observations of flux convergence at the base of events suggests that flux cancellation could play an important role in triggering several of these events, in accord with many recent similar findings of flux cancellation leading to jet eruptions (Huang et al 2015;Panesar et al 2016Panesar et al , 2017Tiwari et al 2016Tiwari et al , 2018Sterling et al 2017Sterling et al , 2018Panesar et al 2018a;López Fuentes et al 2018). As was first proposed by van Ballegooijen & Martens (1989) and Moore & Roumeliotis (1992), and has been observationally confirmed (e.g., Panesar et al 2016Panesar et al , 2017Panesar et al , 2018aTiwari et al 2018;Sterling et al 2018;Chintzoglou et al 2019), the process of flux cancellation (driven by converging photospheric flows) can prepare and trigger the magnetic field that explodes in a flare eruption.…”
Section: (A)supporting
confidence: 89%
“…We obtained this velocity by tracking the front along successive images and then computing the slope of the position versus time curve, from the original filament location to the farthest position reached by the surge front. Although this velocity is higher than the 190 km s −1 obtained for the 12:23 UT surge studied by López Fuentes et al (2018), it is still within the usual values observed in this kind of events (Raouafi et al, 2016). Figure 6b).…”
Section: Uv Continuum and Euv Evolution As Seen From Earthsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…The magnetic evolution of AR 11476 from appearance, on the eastern solar limb, on 04 May 2012 until the end of 10 May has been discussed in detail by López Fuentes et al (2018). We summarize here their main results.…”
Section: Summary Of the Photospheric Magnetic Field Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…López Fuentes et al (2000) reported their existence for the first time in a rotating bipolar AR and they were later observed in many other examples (see e.g. Luoni et al 2011;Mandrini et al 2014;Valori et al 2015;Yardley et al 2016;Vemareddy & Démoulin 2017;Dacie et al 2018;López Fuentes et al 2018). They also have been found in numerical simulations of emerging FRs (Archontis & Hood 2010;Cheung et al 2010;MacTaggart 2011;Jouve et al 2013;Rempel & Cheung 2014;Takasao et al 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%