2015
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.91.024024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physical process first law and caustic avoidance for Rindler horizons

Abstract: We study the perturbation induced by a slowly rotating massive object as it passes through a Rindler horizon. It is shown that the passage of this object can be approximately modeled as delta function type tidal distortions hitting the horizon. Further, following the analysis presented by Amsel, Marolf, and Virmani related to the issue of the validity of physical process first law, we establish a condition on the size of the object so that this law holds for the Rindler horizon.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However once we make the choice of A2 = −4 in order to match with the equilibrium Wald entropy density s HD w , it can be verified that there is no spatial current in this case, but a finite non-equilibrium correction scor to s HD w , see (3.5). 29 Though a mismatch at this stage would have been a serious contradiction with the existing literature and Wald's formalism, we still do not have any abstract proof for it, applicable to any higher derivative theories of gravity. According to our understanding, this would essentially amount to showing a step by step equivalence between the proof of physical version of the first law and the Wald formalism.…”
Section: Jhep06(2020)017mentioning
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However once we make the choice of A2 = −4 in order to match with the equilibrium Wald entropy density s HD w , it can be verified that there is no spatial current in this case, but a finite non-equilibrium correction scor to s HD w , see (3.5). 29 Though a mismatch at this stage would have been a serious contradiction with the existing literature and Wald's formalism, we still do not have any abstract proof for it, applicable to any higher derivative theories of gravity. According to our understanding, this would essentially amount to showing a step by step equivalence between the proof of physical version of the first law and the Wald formalism.…”
Section: Jhep06(2020)017mentioning
confidence: 86%
“…More precisely, if we take the expressions of s HD W ald as computed in subsections 3.1.1, section 3.1.2 and section 3.1.3 and simply remove the terms that would vanish in stationary situations (for example, a term like KK would be ignored), the resultant expressions should exactly match with the correspondingB's derived in this subsection with a specific choice of the coefficient A 2 for every case. 29 It turns out that they indeed match provided we choose the coefficient A 2 to be as follows:…”
Section: Jhep06(2020)017mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, this should not be a problem since, for stationary black holes, we already know that Wald's construction works. In [14], this trickier set of terms were dealt with by taking recourse to the physical process version of the first law [11,[23][24][25][26][27][28]. It was argued that if the physical process version of the first law is to be valid, then things should work out nicely to reproduce the correct expression for the Wald entropy at equilibrium.…”
Section: Jhep09(2021)169mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of black holes, the approach taken to study entropy evolution is to perturb an initial stationary black hole and find the evolution of an entropy functional along a perturbed event horizon, in the spirit of the physical process version of the first law [10][11][12][13][14]. Interestingly, even in this case, viscous effects do not play a role at linear orders in perturbation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%