2003
DOI: 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2003.51104.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physical Performance Measures in the Clinical Setting

Abstract: OBJECTIVES:To assess the ability of gait speed alone and a three-item lower extremity performance battery to predict 12-month rates of hospitalization, decline in health, and decline in function in primary care settings serving older adults. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Primary care programs of a Medicare health maintenance organization (HMO) and Veterans Affairs (VA) system. PARTICIPANTS: Four hundred eighty-seven persons aged 65 and older. MEASUREMENTS: Lower extremity performance Established P… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

21
801
3
21

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,069 publications
(864 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(81 reference statements)
21
801
3
21
Order By: Relevance
“…So, the difference between both walking tests is large and precise enough to measure clinically meaningful changes in walking speed over time at the individual level when these methods are used interchangeably, which will have a direct influence on clinical decision making. Furthermore, this study emphasizes that when using cut-off values (Abellan van Kan et al 2009;Montero-Odasso et al 2005;Studenski et al 2003Studenski et al , 2011 for clinical decision making, clinicians should be aware that they depend on the assessment method of walking speed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…So, the difference between both walking tests is large and precise enough to measure clinically meaningful changes in walking speed over time at the individual level when these methods are used interchangeably, which will have a direct influence on clinical decision making. Furthermore, this study emphasizes that when using cut-off values (Abellan van Kan et al 2009;Montero-Odasso et al 2005;Studenski et al 2003Studenski et al , 2011 for clinical decision making, clinicians should be aware that they depend on the assessment method of walking speed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The tests used in this study are reliable and valid clinical tools commonly used in assessing muscle strength and mobility in community‐dwelling older adults. Moreover, they require limited space and can be administered quickly 8, 31, 32. Although these clinical tests are very simple, parameters with poor performance predict adverse health in older adults and would have advantages over other common markers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a low SPPB score is a strong predictor of disability in nondisabled older persons [8], independent of other health conditions and socioeconomic factors [9], the SPPB has been widely used in geriatric research and epidemiological studies to identify frail older persons [10,11]. Interestingly, the LIFE-P study [11] provides conclusive evidence that structured physical activity interventions improve the 400-m walking speed and the SPPB score in frail, home dwelling older persons, suggesting that structured physical activity interventions might have the potential to counteract, or at least to slow down, the occurrence of disability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%