2017
DOI: 10.1186/s12882-017-0562-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physical performance and protein-energy wasting in patients treated with nocturnal haemodialysis compared to conventional haemodialysis: protocol of the DiapriFIT study

Abstract: BackgroundPoor physical performance and protein-energy wasting (PEW) are health issues of major concern in haemodialysis patients. The conventional haemodialysis (CHD) regime, three times per week 3–5 h, is subject of discussion because of high morbidity and mortality rates. When patients switch from CHD to longer dialysis sessions, i.e. nocturnal haemodialysis (NHD), improvement in protein intake and increase in body weight is seen. However, it is unclear whether physical performance and more important aspect… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…FFM was measured by air displacement plethysmography technology (BODPOD, Canada) in the ANAC population [11e14] and by bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) in the Amsterdam UMC population. Different impedance analyzers were used: BIS Xitron 400b (Xitron Technologies, USA) [16,17], Bodystat 1500 MDD (Bodystat, UK) [15,19], Bodystat 500 (Bodystat, UK) [19], BIA RJL Systems 101 (Clinton Township, USA) [18], Body Composition Monitor (Fresenius Medical Care, Bad Homburg, Germany) [20]. To calculate FFM in a similar way, the crude values (resistance and reactance) of the measurements were used to calculate FFM using the Geneva equation [21].…”
Section: Measurement Of Ffmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FFM was measured by air displacement plethysmography technology (BODPOD, Canada) in the ANAC population [11e14] and by bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) in the Amsterdam UMC population. Different impedance analyzers were used: BIS Xitron 400b (Xitron Technologies, USA) [16,17], Bodystat 1500 MDD (Bodystat, UK) [15,19], Bodystat 500 (Bodystat, UK) [19], BIA RJL Systems 101 (Clinton Township, USA) [18], Body Composition Monitor (Fresenius Medical Care, Bad Homburg, Germany) [20]. To calculate FFM in a similar way, the crude values (resistance and reactance) of the measurements were used to calculate FFM using the Geneva equation [21].…”
Section: Measurement Of Ffmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measurements were mostly performed about 30 min after HD treatment, with the intention to measure the most optimal stability in a patient's body fluid compartments. More details regarding body composition and anthropometric measurements were previously described [18].…”
Section: Body Composition and Anthropometric Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the current study provided evidence that our working definition of PEW was valid at least in predicting CKD progression. Moreover, previous studies also did not strictly follow the recommendations because of the uncertainty in the diagnostic criteria [15,41,42]. Second, other nutritional data including daily calorie intake and body composition data including fat distribution and lean mass were not available because KNOW-CKD was not originally designed to identify the effect of DPI and PEW on renal outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%