2014
DOI: 10.1063/1.4896749
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physical origin of nanograting formation on fused silica with femtosecond pulses

Abstract: We present a comprehensive analysis of physical evolution of nanograting formation based on an experiment performed with femtosecond pulses focused under moderate focusing conditions and where pulse energy is slowly increased as the focused beam is moved along the sample surface. The results demonstrate that nanograting inscription is initiated at the location of the maximum plasma density and evolves through local intensity side lobes, whose locations are self-regulated in a closed feedback loop, in agreement… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…, SiODC (II). 7,20–23 The few pulses limit the defect incubation process 28 (null formation of nanogratings, see Fig. 3a), being distributed within a narrow region with certain orientation, but still low anisotropic degree as will be shown below.…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…, SiODC (II). 7,20–23 The few pulses limit the defect incubation process 28 (null formation of nanogratings, see Fig. 3a), being distributed within a narrow region with certain orientation, but still low anisotropic degree as will be shown below.…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The point defects include E′ centres, non-bridging oxygen hole centres (NBOHC), and divalent silicon with oxygen deficiency centres, i.e., SiODC (II). 7,[20][21][22][23] The few pulses limit the defect incubation process 28 (null formation of nanogratings, see Fig. 3a), being distributed within a narrow region with certain orientation, but still low anisotropic degree as will be shown below.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%