1993
DOI: 10.1016/0040-1951(93)90344-j
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physical modelling of overburden deformation around salt diapirs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
17
0
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
4
17
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Though the pressure source is not located at the surface, this undeformed wedge shares strong similarities with the well‐known Prandtl's wedge for shallow strip footings in geomechanics (see, e.g., Davis & Selvadurai, ). These results show that the final damage spatial distribution reproduces quite accurately the results of published geological field observations (see, e.g., Merle et al, ) and analog modeling (Acocella et al, ; Brothelande & Merle, ; Davison et al, ; Marti et al, ; Merle et al, ; Merle & Vendeville, ; Sanford, ): Resurgent domes are structures with reverse faulting on their external boundaries and internal normal faulting (see, e.g., Acocella et al, ; and, for a typical example, the Yenkahe complex; Brothelande, Peltier, et al, ; Merle et al, ). Field geological observations show that magmatic intrusions associated with resurgence are bordered by reverse faults (Fridrich et al, ), which can explain the abrupt transition between the flat caldera moat and the dipping layers of the dome flanks.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Though the pressure source is not located at the surface, this undeformed wedge shares strong similarities with the well‐known Prandtl's wedge for shallow strip footings in geomechanics (see, e.g., Davis & Selvadurai, ). These results show that the final damage spatial distribution reproduces quite accurately the results of published geological field observations (see, e.g., Merle et al, ) and analog modeling (Acocella et al, ; Brothelande & Merle, ; Davison et al, ; Marti et al, ; Merle et al, ; Merle & Vendeville, ; Sanford, ): Resurgent domes are structures with reverse faulting on their external boundaries and internal normal faulting (see, e.g., Acocella et al, ; and, for a typical example, the Yenkahe complex; Brothelande, Peltier, et al, ; Merle et al, ). Field geological observations show that magmatic intrusions associated with resurgence are bordered by reverse faults (Fridrich et al, ), which can explain the abrupt transition between the flat caldera moat and the dipping layers of the dome flanks.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…4C, 5C & E), suggesting that the mounds were emplaced on the seabed (Riis et al, 2005). Had these mounds been emplaced in the subsurface, substantial deformation of stratigraphy above the mounds would be expected similar to that predicted around diapirs (Davison et al, 1993). This is not observed.…”
Section: Moundmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…and abundance of the ductile material, on the physical‐geological characteristics of the overburden (e.g., density, strength, thickness, etc. ), on the timing relationships between diapirism and tectonics, and on the effect of deformation on both the overburden and the underlying source horizon [e.g., Koyi , 1988; Schultz‐Ela et al , 1993; Davison et al , 1993; Daudré and Cloething , 1994; Letouzey et al , 1995; Waltham , 1997; Cotton and Koyi , 2000; Sans , 2003].…”
Section: Mechanism Of Emplacement: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because salt intrudes along a fracture, the lower levels of the diapiric structure are likely to be elliptical rather than circular in plan. Along with flexuring and compaction of the cover rocks, the creation of space will also be accomplished by the displacement of the roof of the diapir upward either by faulting, folding, or by the conjunction of both mechanisms [e.g., Schultz‐Ela et al , 1993; Davison et al , 1993; Tikoff et al , 1999].…”
Section: Mechanism Of Emplacement: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%