2017
DOI: 10.1103/physrevx.7.021037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physical Model of the Genotype-to-Phenotype Map of Proteins

Abstract: How DNA is mapped to functional proteins is a basic question of living matter. We introduce and study a physical model of protein evolution which suggests a mechanical basis for this map. Many proteins rely on large-scale motion to function. We therefore treat protein as learning amorphous matter that evolves towards such a mechanical function: Genes are binary sequences that encode the connectivity of the amino acid network that makes a protein. The gene is evolved until the network forms a shear band across … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
(85 reference statements)
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Dimension reduction from high-dimensional phenotypic states has gathered much attention recently in the studying biological systems and in protein dynamics [11,[18][19][20][21][22][23][24]. Changes in the concentrations of most mRNA and protein species in response to environmental stress are suggested to be mainly restricted to a one-dimensional subspace.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dimension reduction from high-dimensional phenotypic states has gathered much attention recently in the studying biological systems and in protein dynamics [11,[18][19][20][21][22][23][24]. Changes in the concentrations of most mRNA and protein species in response to environmental stress are suggested to be mainly restricted to a one-dimensional subspace.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scalar models, where the response of a node is described by a scalar instead of a vector, have been introduced to study coevolution and allostery [19,20]. Although these models can capture the rigid motion of a part of the system, they cannot address the propagation of more complex mechanical information, such as that illustrated in Fig.…”
Section: Description Of the Evolution Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This result supports that in at least some proteins elasticity -possibly non-linear -is an appropriate language to describe allostery (in contrast to intrinsically disordered proteins that may be considered more as liquids than solids, for which the analysis proposed here would not hold). Very recently, there has been a considerable effort to use insilico evolution [16,17] to study how linear elastic materials can evolve to accomplish an allosteric task [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26]. In general, binding a ligand locally distorts the protein, which is modelled by imposing local displacements at some site, generating an extended elastic response that in turn determines fitness (chosen specifically to accomplish a given task).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%