2014
DOI: 10.4161/21624011.2014.968434
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physical modalities inducing immunogenic tumor cell death for cancer immunotherapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
129
1
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 167 publications
(136 citation statements)
references
References 116 publications
(177 reference statements)
0
129
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…High Hydrostatic Pressure (Adkins et al, 2014, Microwave Thermal Ablation (Yu et al, 2014), Specific forms of Radiation therapy , Gameiro et al, 2014, Obeid et al, 2007, Schildkopf et al, 2011 and UVC irradiation …”
Section: Physico-chemical or Mechanical Stress-based Therapeutics/agentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High Hydrostatic Pressure (Adkins et al, 2014, Microwave Thermal Ablation (Yu et al, 2014), Specific forms of Radiation therapy , Gameiro et al, 2014, Obeid et al, 2007, Schildkopf et al, 2011 and UVC irradiation …”
Section: Physico-chemical or Mechanical Stress-based Therapeutics/agentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The heat also has an immunomodulatory effect by releasing intact antigens that can trigger an antitumor immune response [97,98]. Therefore, the size of the ablation zone can be enhanced by the concomitant local application of cytotoxic drugs [95,99].…”
Section: Nsclcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among this abundant literature, we found of especial interest the works of (1) Arulanandam and colleagues (Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada), who discovered that a transcriptional modulator operating downstream of vascular endothelial growth factor receptors (VEGFRs) 208,209 suppresses Type I interferon (IFN) responses, 210 hence sensitizing the tumor vasculature to infection by oncolytic viruses, 211 and found that microtubule-destabilizing agents commonly employed in the clinic (e.g., paclitaxel) 212,213 synergize with oncolytic virotherapy by disrupting the translation of Type I IFN-coding mRNAs and by exacerbating the demise of cancer cells provoked by the cytopathic effect; 214 (2) Nishio and collaborators (Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, US), who reported that an oncolytic adenovirus genetically engineered to express interleukin-15 (IL-15) and chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 5 (CCL5, also known as RANTES) improved the therapeutic potential of adoptively transferred T cells expressing a chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) 215,216 [218][219][220][221][222] a means to boost the replication (and hence the efficacy) of an oncolytic HSV-1 strain; 223 (4) Parrish and co-authors (St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK), who discovered that an oncolytic reovirus enhances the capacity of the FDA-approved CD20-targeting monoclonal antibody rituximab 224,225 to stimulate antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity; 226 , who discovered that autonomous parvoviruses are endowed with a rather advantageous feature for the development of novel oncolytic virotherapies, namely, they neither trigger nor inhibit Type I IFN responses in normal and malignant cells; 236 (11) Zloza and coauthors (Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, US), who suggested that the downregulation of leukocyte immunoglobulin-like receptor, subfamily B (with TM and ITIM domains), member 1 (LILRB1, also known as ILT2) in peripheral blood mononuclear cells may constitute a reliable biomarker of therapeutic responses to oncolytic virotherapy in cancer patients; 237 (12) Liikanen and colleagues (University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland), who propose that the circulating levels of the damage-associated molecular pattern high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) [238][239][240][241] at baseline may constitute a robust prognostic factor as well as a predictive indicator of disease control up...…”
Section: Preclinical and Translational Advancesmentioning
confidence: 99%