Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2008.08.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physical mechanisms of heat transfer during single bubble nucleate boiling of FC-72 under saturation conditions-I. Experimental investigation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
44
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(82 reference statements)
4
44
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are in agreement with the numerical work by Son et al (1999). Recent work by Moghaddam and Kiger (2009) showed similar results for FC-72.…”
Section: Figsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…These results are in agreement with the numerical work by Son et al (1999). Recent work by Moghaddam and Kiger (2009) showed similar results for FC-72.…”
Section: Figsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In a constant wall temperature boundary condition, the heat flux greatly increases when a bubble grows on the substrate, in order to keep the wall temperature constant. Lee et al (2003) <50 % R11 Constant T wall Demiray & Kim (2004) <12.5 % FC-72 Constant T wall Liao, Mei & Klausner (2004) a <30 % -- Myers et al (2005) 23 % FC-72 Constant heat flux Kim, Oh & Kim (2006) 44-360 % b R113 Constant T wall Wagner & Stephan (2009) 22 % FC-84/3284 Constant heat flux Moghaddam & Kiger (2009a) 16-29 % FC-72 Constant heat flux Gerardi et al (2009) ∼50-65 % Deionized water Constant heat flux Gerardi et al (2010) ∼100-115 % Deionized water Constant heat flux From these results, it appears that roughly 25 % of the heat required for bubble growth is accounted for by heat extracted from the wall. It also seems that the application of a constant wall temperature condition or constant heat flux condition yields roughly the same results.…”
Section: Overview Of Heat Transfer Mechanisms Proposed In Boilingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Natural convection is driven by density differences in the liquid and since the temperature difference decreases with the enhance surface, the driving force for natural convection is weaker. Even small changes in bubble formation, departure and frequency have been shown to cause significant changes of the single phase convection mechanism for a single bubble [3]. Hence, the enhanced single phase convection heat transfer could be expected to come from the strong convection caused by the agitation of the vapor bubbles inside of the porous coatings and by the increase in the number of nucleate sites.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of high resolution experimental techniques, for instance: micro fabricated heater devices with integrated temperature sensors, micro-heater arrays and high speed infrared cameras by researchers such as Stephan and Kern [1], Demiray and Kim [2], Moghaddam and Kiger [3] have been of great importance to recent advancements in the understanding of the mechanisms of nucleate boiling heat transfer. These studies have been able to discern and quantify the effect and interactions of different heat transfer mechanisms, such as; transient conduction, single phase micro convection and micro-layer evaporation and have therefore contributed greatly to the understanding of the boiling phenomenon.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%