1923
DOI: 10.1002/j.1538-7305.1923.tb01296.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physical Measurements of Audition and Their Bearing on the Theory of Hearing*

Abstract: Synopsis: The author states his purpose to be the presentation of certain facts of audition which have been determined recently with considerable accuracy and the discussion of the theory which best explains these facts. Making use of data of Knudsen's as well as his own measurements of the auditory sensation area, the author estimates that the normal ear can perceive approximately 300,000 different pure tones. This is taking account of all possible variations in both pitch and intensity. Knudsen's data show t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1926
1926
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the audible range lies between 20 Hz and 20 kHz in humans, speech can be regularly identified within the more narrow band width between 300 Hz and 3.4 kHz, which therefore has been used as the "telephone bandwidth" according to the standards of the International Telecommunication Union [31,32] Additionally, frequency-dependent attenuation changes the amplitude spectrum of speech as the corresponding sounds enter the incubator. According to Fletcher et al (1923), the intelligibility of speech depends on the sum of different frequency bands, speech intensity, and temporal properties of the stimulus [33,34]. Consequently, the reduction of speech loudness by 15 dB(A) at frequencies above 250 Hz will impair the transfer of speech into the incubator.…”
Section: Acoustic Properties Of the Incubatormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although the audible range lies between 20 Hz and 20 kHz in humans, speech can be regularly identified within the more narrow band width between 300 Hz and 3.4 kHz, which therefore has been used as the "telephone bandwidth" according to the standards of the International Telecommunication Union [31,32] Additionally, frequency-dependent attenuation changes the amplitude spectrum of speech as the corresponding sounds enter the incubator. According to Fletcher et al (1923), the intelligibility of speech depends on the sum of different frequency bands, speech intensity, and temporal properties of the stimulus [33,34]. Consequently, the reduction of speech loudness by 15 dB(A) at frequencies above 250 Hz will impair the transfer of speech into the incubator.…”
Section: Acoustic Properties Of the Incubatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the acoustic environment of preterm infants is rather characterized by unstructured, sudden and unpredictable noise sources. Knowing that at 1 kHz and above 40 dB, the perceived loudness doubles if the sound pressure level is increased by 9 dB [33], it visualizes that the loudness perceived by preterm infants increases substantially by minor manipulations such as accessing the baby, by alarms, or cabinet use. This is because perceived loudness roughly doubles with each 10 dB increase in SPL (more accurately, it doubles with each 9 dB increase in SPL at 1 kHz and above 40 dB).…”
Section: Conclusion For the Newborn Inside The Incubatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The wish to have a unit independent of frequency led to the de nition of a "transmission unit" [7] a dimensionless unit when the proportionality constant is exactly one tenth. At this time also, Harvey Fletcher [8] was Working in the Bell System Laboratories on the direct ratio scaling of loudness, using the voltage induced into a telephonecircuit as the measure of sound pressure. From his research he introduced a "loudness unit" for an incremental change of one tenth in the logarithm of the mean square pressure.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Acoustic absorption is likewise dealt with. Fletcher (20) gives detailed figures on the masking effect of sound and on the sensitivity of the human ear. Foley (21) notes the velocity of sound for different media.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%