2024
DOI: 10.1109/access.2023.3344654
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physical Layer Security With Near-Field Beamforming

João Ferreira,
João Guerreiro,
Rui Dinis

Abstract: Extremely large antenna arrays (ELAAs) are being proposed for sixth-generation (6G) systems as an evolution of massive multiple-input, multiple-output (mMIMO). Besides having a large number of antennas, ELAAs can be physically large, which makes communication in the radiative near-field very likely. This means the plane wave approximation does not hold and channel models that accurately capture the propagation effects in the near-field are required. Recent works have highlighted the beamfocusing effect availab… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(50 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Their study emphasized the impact of near-field beamforming on PLS, particularly in conjunction with the spherical-wavefront model. In [11,12], the authors considered the PLS features in radiative near-field communication for ELAAs, demonstrating that beamfocusing with Matched Filtering (MF) beamforming substantially improves jamming rejection and secrecy rates. In [16], the focus lies on achieving PLS through constellation shaping.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Their study emphasized the impact of near-field beamforming on PLS, particularly in conjunction with the spherical-wavefront model. In [11,12], the authors considered the PLS features in radiative near-field communication for ELAAs, demonstrating that beamfocusing with Matched Filtering (MF) beamforming substantially improves jamming rejection and secrecy rates. In [16], the focus lies on achieving PLS through constellation shaping.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This necessity arises from the substantial increase in the far-field distance, implying a heightened likelihood that the communication occurs in the near field. Despite the propagation distance potentially exceeding the Fraunhofer distance of each antenna element, it is important to note that the distance might remain considerably lower than the Fraunhofer array distance, which is defined as D FA = 2D 2 sub λ , where D sub is the maximum distance between antennas of a given sub-array [11].…”
Section: Near-field Channel Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation