2011 IEEE International Conference on Microwaves, Communications, Antennas and Electronic Systems (COMCAS 2011) 2011
DOI: 10.1109/comcas.2011.6105900
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physical layer security in UWB networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…WSNs that rely on UWB radio signals are somewhat inherently more secure, since the low output power and the short pulses of the emitted signals make their transmissions to appear as white noise from a distance (Karapistoli, Pavlidou, Gragopoulos, & Tsetsinas, 2010). Nevertheless, UWB signals could potentially be sniffed by a determined attacker located close to the transmitter (Ghose & Bose, 2011;Ko & Goeckel, 2010), enabling the latter to launch an attack against the WSN. Therefore, even this class of WSNs calls for the development of intelligent security systems that will safeguard the network's uninterrupted operation against attackers that have penetrated the first perimeter of defense.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…WSNs that rely on UWB radio signals are somewhat inherently more secure, since the low output power and the short pulses of the emitted signals make their transmissions to appear as white noise from a distance (Karapistoli, Pavlidou, Gragopoulos, & Tsetsinas, 2010). Nevertheless, UWB signals could potentially be sniffed by a determined attacker located close to the transmitter (Ghose & Bose, 2011;Ko & Goeckel, 2010), enabling the latter to launch an attack against the WSN. Therefore, even this class of WSNs calls for the development of intelligent security systems that will safeguard the network's uninterrupted operation against attackers that have penetrated the first perimeter of defense.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the available PHY options, the impulse radio ultra-wideband (IR-UWB) PHY (formerly defined in the IEEE 802.15.4a-2007 standard) has several advanced http://jis.eurasipjournals.com/content/2014/1/3 the low output power and short pulses of these signals make their transmissions to appear as white noise from a distance. Nevertheless, UWB signals could potentially be sniffed by a determined attacker who is located close to the transmitter, enabling the latter to launch an attack against the WSN [7,8]. Therefore, even this class of WSNs requires that security mechanisms are implemented at every layer of the sensor network protocol stack.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%