2017
DOI: 10.1002/dac.3468
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physical layer security for dual‐hop FSO/RF system using generalized ΓΓ/ημ fading channels

Abstract: We investigate the physical layer security of decode-and-forward-relayed free space optics (FSO)/radio frequency (RF) communication system. In this network, the eavesdropper exists after relay node and overhears RF transmission.Further, FSO being a line-of-sight transmission is assumed to be secure from eavesdroppers. Here, we have the Gamma-Gamma (ΓΓ) distribution for FSO link and generalized − distribution for RF link. The security for information transmission to the legitimate user in the presence of an eav… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…• Differing from [12]- [15], the DL mixed RF-FSO systems were studied in this work, in which both SNRs at legitimate and illegitimate destinations are influenced by the FSO link. • Although the secrecy performance of DL mixed RF-FSO systems was investigated in [28], the correlation of the SNR at both legitimate and illegitimate receivers was not considered. Furthermore, SWIPT, path-loss fading, and multiple antennas are considered in this work.…”
Section: B Motivation and Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Differing from [12]- [15], the DL mixed RF-FSO systems were studied in this work, in which both SNRs at legitimate and illegitimate destinations are influenced by the FSO link. • Although the secrecy performance of DL mixed RF-FSO systems was investigated in [28], the correlation of the SNR at both legitimate and illegitimate receivers was not considered. Furthermore, SWIPT, path-loss fading, and multiple antennas are considered in this work.…”
Section: B Motivation and Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The average secrecy capacity of the RF link, denoted as Cfalse¯sR, for a given instantaneous SNR of the L and E RF links, i.e. γLR and γER respectively, can be defined as [58] Cfalse¯sRfalse(γLR,γERfalse)=Efalse[CsRfalse(kfalse)false]=0normal∞0normal∞Csfalse(kfalse)fγLRfalse(γLRfalse)fγERfalse(γERfalse)dγLR dγER, where Efalse(.false) is the expectation operation and fγLR and fγER…”
Section: The Proposed Security-aware Spatial Modulation Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the dwnlink scenario, authors of [24] evaluated the secrecy capacity and the secrecy outage probability of the proposed system. In [25], authors studied the mixed FSO/RF system when both the legitimate receiver and eavesdropper decode the information and harvest the energy simultaneously from the second hop RF link.…”
Section: Pls In Fso Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%