Proceedings of the Sixteenth Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking 2010
DOI: 10.1145/1859995.1860035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physical-layer identification of UHF RFID tags

Abstract: In this work, we study physical-layer identification of passive UHF RFID tags. We collect signals from a population of 70 tags using a purpose-built reader and we analyze time domain and spectral features of the collected signals. We show that, based on timing features of the signals, UHF RFID tags can be classified, independently of the location and distance to the reader (evaluated up to 6 meters), with an accuracy of approx. 71% (within our population). Additionally, we show that is possible to uniquely ide… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
105
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 139 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
105
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the EPC C1G2 specification, the backscatter link frequency (BLF) at which tags communicate is defined within a range between 40 and 640 kHz with a frequency tolerance between ±4% and ±22% depending on the selected BLF. As shown by Periaswamy et al [23] and Zanetti et al [34], the relatively large BLF tolerances allowed by the EPC specification can represent a distinguishing factor between different tags of the same model and manufacturer. Additionally, it has been shown [34] that the BLF is not affected by the tag-reader distance and mutual position; this can allow tag distinguishability disregarding tags' location and position.…”
Section: Signal Features and Tag Fingerprintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…According to the EPC C1G2 specification, the backscatter link frequency (BLF) at which tags communicate is defined within a range between 40 and 640 kHz with a frequency tolerance between ±4% and ±22% depending on the selected BLF. As shown by Periaswamy et al [23] and Zanetti et al [34], the relatively large BLF tolerances allowed by the EPC specification can represent a distinguishing factor between different tags of the same model and manufacturer. Additionally, it has been shown [34] that the BLF is not affected by the tag-reader distance and mutual position; this can allow tag distinguishability disregarding tags' location and position.…”
Section: Signal Features and Tag Fingerprintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown by Periaswamy et al [23] and Zanetti et al [34], the relatively large BLF tolerances allowed by the EPC specification can represent a distinguishing factor between different tags of the same model and manufacturer. Additionally, it has been shown [34] that the BLF is not affected by the tag-reader distance and mutual position; this can allow tag distinguishability disregarding tags' location and position. Therefore, the signal feature we consider for tag identification is the backscatter link frequency at which each tag transmits data.…”
Section: Signal Features and Tag Fingerprintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations