2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109440
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physical interactions between MCM and Rad51 facilitate replication fork lesion bypass and ssDNA gap filling by non-recombinogenic functions

Abstract: Highlights d Rad51 and Rad52 interact with MCM in a nuclease-insoluble nucleoprotein scaffold d MCM/Rad51/Rad52 accumulation is regulated by cell cycle and replicative DNA damage d Cdc7 prevents Rad51/Rad52 release from the scaffold under replicative DNA damage d MCM/Rad51 promotes MMS-induced gap filling and fork progression by non-HR processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another piece of evidence supporting the non-recombinogenic role of Rad51 and Rad52 in the DDT response comes from the analysis in S. cerevisiae of the physical interactions between these proteins and the MCM complex, an essential component of the CMG (Cdc45/MCM/GINS) replicative helicase [6]. A rad51 mutation that disrupts the interaction between Rad51 and MCM was proficient in MMS and DSB-induced HR but partially defective in MMS-induced ssDNA gap filling, supporting a role for this interaction in TLS.…”
Section: Non-recombinogenic Roles Of Rad51 and Rad52 In Tlsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Another piece of evidence supporting the non-recombinogenic role of Rad51 and Rad52 in the DDT response comes from the analysis in S. cerevisiae of the physical interactions between these proteins and the MCM complex, an essential component of the CMG (Cdc45/MCM/GINS) replicative helicase [6]. A rad51 mutation that disrupts the interaction between Rad51 and MCM was proficient in MMS and DSB-induced HR but partially defective in MMS-induced ssDNA gap filling, supporting a role for this interaction in TLS.…”
Section: Non-recombinogenic Roles Of Rad51 and Rad52 In Tlsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Actually, this mutant was also partially defective in replication fork progression through damaged DNA and this defect could be bypassed by forcing the interaction through the simultaneous expression of Mcm4-GFP and Rad51-GBP (GFP-binding protein) chimeras. Thus, the MCM-Rad51 interaction facilitates DNA damage-induced ssDNA gap filling and fork progression through DNA blocking lesions by non-recombinogenic functions, presumably TLS (Figure 2A,D) [6].…”
Section: Non-recombinogenic Roles Of Rad51 and Rad52 In Tlsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations